On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 16:44:32 UTC, William wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > On 2015-03-11, Nils Bruin wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 2:46:25 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 16:44:32 UTC, William wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> > On 2015-03-11, Nils Bruin > wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 2:46:25 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I tried this integral directly in Maxima, and
On 2015-03-11, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 2:46:25 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> I tried this integral directly in Maxima, and taking bfloat of it
>> outputs nonsense.
>>
>
> I have noticed before that bfloats aren't infectious enough: operations on
> bfloats can
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 2:46:25 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I tried this integral directly in Maxima, and taking bfloat of it
> outputs nonsense.
>
I have noticed before that bfloats aren't infectious enough: operations on
bfloats can easily result in a normal "double". I think
On 2015-03-10, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 9:04:14 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-03-10, M M > wrote:
>> > I get different results from Sage when I try to get a numerical
>> > approximation for an expression and if I use evaluate a preparse of the
>> > strin
See also the answers to
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/10256/how-can-extract-different-terms-from-a-symbolic-expression/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
