Re: [sage-support] Re: interact.sagemath.org down?

2014-10-21 Thread William Stein
On Oct 21, 2014 6:20 PM, "kcrisman" wrote: >> >> >> I've attached two screenshots proving this (showing the load times, >> number of requests, total data transferred, etc.). >> > > I'm not disputing your own results. I'm just saying that it isn't always my experience, and it depends a lot on one'

Re: [sage-support] Re: interact.sagemath.org down?

2014-10-21 Thread kcrisman
> > > I've attached two screenshots proving this (showing the load times, > number of requests, total data transferred, etc.). > > I'm not disputing your own results. I'm just saying that it isn't always my experience, and it depends a lot on one's bandwidth situation. Even just now while lo

Re: [sage-support] Re: interact.sagemath.org down?

2014-10-21 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:06 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:18 PM, kcrisman wrote: >>> posting to a separate interact.sagemath.org website (and actively >>> maintaining it against spam) is rather high compared to just hitting a >>> button to publish a worksheet. >> >> >> Tru

[sage-support] Re: matrix log?

2014-10-21 Thread Robert Dodier
On 2014-10-21, Rafael wrote: > Does sage have built-in the analog of MatrixLog in Mathematica? > > I noticed that one can use logm in scipy: > > from scipy import linalg > matrix(linalg.logm(mat)) Well, in Maxima there is mat_function, e.g.: load ("diag"); mat_function (log, mymatrix);

Re: [sage-support] How to handle file in Sage

2014-10-21 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:19 PM, kcrisman wrote: >> > differently) >> >> Thanks - I meant %runfile not %execfile. I find it hard to remember, >> which is yet another reason I am against removal of the more memorable %load >> that we had for years. >> >> > >> > > Agreed, but this was semi-unavoida

Re: [sage-support] How to handle file in Sage

2014-10-21 Thread kcrisman
> > > differently) > > Thanks - I meant %runfile not %execfile. I find it hard to remember, > which is yet another reason I am against removal of the more memorable > %load that we had for years. > > > > > Agreed, but this was semi-unavoidable because of the Ipython upgrade a while back, thoug

Re: [sage-support] Re: interact.sagemath.org down?

2014-10-21 Thread kcrisman
> > > I think having public cloud files, like William just enabled, plus a > curated index of really nice examples, plus maybe a wiki page of short > simple examples, is a better approach than the rather heavy-weight > interact.sagemath.org. I think the biggest thing I took from running > int

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage Upgrade Port Number?

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Maness
The binary seems to be running fine for now. Chris On Oct 21, 2014 12:11 PM, "Volker Braun" wrote: > Sage doesn't compile on OSX 10.10 at the moment. See the sage-devel > thread. > > > > > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:56:27 PM UTC+1, Chris Maness wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage Upgrade Port Number?

2014-10-21 Thread Volker Braun
Sage doesn't compile on OSX 10.10 at the moment. See the sage-devel thread. On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 6:56:27 PM UTC+1, Chris Maness wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:02 AM, kcrisman > wrote: > >> >> >> >>> What port does the Sage upgrade use so that IT can add a firewall rule >

Re: [sage-support] Sage with Yosemite?

2014-10-21 Thread Jim Clark
On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > Has anyone tried the 6.3 binary with Sage? > > Thanks, > Chris Just a bit-- started it up and ran the notebook. Seems to be there, but haven't tested old worksheets yet. Jim Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

[sage-support] Sage with Yosemite?

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Maness
Has anyone tried the 6.3 binary with Sage? Thanks, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to t

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage Upgrade Port Number?

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Maness
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:02 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > >> What port does the Sage upgrade use so that IT can add a firewall rule >> for me to upgrade Sage? >> >> > Hi! I'm not sure what you mean; usually the easiest thing to do to > upgrade Sage is either > 1) download a new binary manually and

[sage-support] Re: Sage Upgrade Port Number?

2014-10-21 Thread kcrisman
> What port does the Sage upgrade use so that IT can add a firewall rule for > me to upgrade Sage? > > Hi! I'm not sure what you mean; usually the easiest thing to do to upgrade Sage is either 1) download a new binary manually and just use that one, since the metadata is not in the Sage bin

Re: [sage-support] Re: interact.sagemath.org down?

2014-10-21 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Benedikt Magnússon wrote: > Ok. Having a public cloud file seems like good solution. > But interact doesn't work properly with it, where the applet should appear > there is only > "(interacts not available)" That's not implemented yet. -- William -- William St

[sage-support] Re: interact.sagemath.org down?

2014-10-21 Thread Benedikt Magnússon
Ok. Having a public cloud file seems like good solution. But interact doesn't work properly with it, where the applet should appear there is only "(interacts not available)" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from t

[sage-support] Sage Upgrade Port Number?

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Maness
What port does the Sage upgrade use so that IT can add a firewall rule for me to upgrade Sage? Thanks, Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sag

[sage-support] matrix log?

2014-10-21 Thread Rafael
Does sage have built-in the analog of MatrixLog in Mathematica? I noticed that one can use logm in scipy: from scipy import linalg matrix(linalg.logm(mat)) (where mat is the matrix whose log is to be computed), but I am wondering whether there is a better way? Thank you. -- You received