On 08/18/2014 04:05 PM, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> Yes, I ran uxterm and I still see strange characters there. Any ideas?
>
> Thank you,
>
You also need to be using a font which supplies those glyphs. I think
the DejaVu family should have them if you want to test using that.
--
You received this mess
>
> Thanks, Dima, I will continue to experiment. At the moment I am
>> having fun with show3d(color_by_label=True)!
>>
>
> There are two helper functions you may like, buried in a module because I
> did not know how to write a nice user interface for that:
>
> sage: from sage.graphs.graph_plot
>
> Maybe you want to review this ticket:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16796
>
>
What Volker means by this is that he doesn't have access to a 10.6 buildbot
to try this out. Apparently the machine that was there gave up the
ghost... ? (Volker, did anyone get back to you on the status of
Well, the limit of your expression as x goes to 3 does exist.
Oscar.
El lunes, 18 de agosto de 2014 15:07:47 UTC-5, Ron Bannon escribió:
>
> solve( (x^2-9)/(x-3) >= 0, x) should yield x >= -3, x neq 3, but Sage just
> gives x >= -3. Any thoughts?
>
--
You received this message because you are
solve( (x^2-9)/(x-3) >= 0, x) should yield x >= -3, x neq 3, but Sage just
gives x >= -3. Any thoughts?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-sup
Yes, I ran uxterm and I still see strange characters there. Any ideas?
Thank you,
Oscar.
El lunes, 18 de agosto de 2014 14:41:42 UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik escribió:
>
> On 2014-08-18, Oscar Lazo > wrote:
> > --=_Part_1633_1643381375.1408388447844
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
On 2014-08-18, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> --=_Part_1633_1643381375.1408388447844
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi!
>
> I used to see some straight lines when I started the sage command-line (the
> ones surrounding the header), but now I see some question marks of the kind
> you see
Hi!
I used to see some straight lines when I started the sage command-line (the
ones surrounding the header), but now I see some question marks of the kind
you see when your system doesn't recognize some character. What do you
think I'm missing? I have an Ubuntu system.
http://i.imgur.com/NItM
On Monday, August 18, 2014 9:25:56 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
>
> You could use q.dict() instead which has the appropriate order, but
> encodes the monomials as exponent vectors, which are hard to convert to At.
> [you should go that route, though, because the other method can give you
> wron
On Monday, August 18, 2014 7:11:53 AM UTC-7, juaninf wrote:
>
> Dear Emmanuel,
> Thank, ... one last question ... How I will be able to extract the
> coefficients of t^0,t^1,...,t^(p-1)
>
> I wouldn't trust SR with anything in positive characteristic. It is not
designed for it and it is hard to
Maybe you want to review this ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16796
On Monday, August 18, 2014 3:26:27 PM UTC+1, Daniel Friedan wrote:
>
> For OS X 10.6, there is no -app build of Sage 6.3 available for download,
> only
> sage-6.3-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.9_x86_64-app.dmg
> sage-
For OS X 10.6, there is no -app build of Sage 6.3 available for download,
only
sage-6.3-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.9_x86_64-app.dmg
sage-6.2-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.6_x86_64-app.dmg
Is this a new policy? Will those of us who don't like OS X >10.6 have to
learn to build the OS X 10.6 -app ver
Dear Emmanuel,
Thank, ... one last question ... How I will be able to extract the
coefficients of t^0,t^1,...,t^(p-1)
2014-08-18 5:49 GMT-03:00 Emmanuel Charpentier <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com>:
> If I follow your cpde correctly, you are working on polynoms in X0,..,X3.
> What you attempt to
If I follow your cpde correctly, you are working on polynoms in X0,..,X3.
What you attempt to create would be a polynom in x00,..,x03,x10..x33.
Doubleplusungood...
You should probaby use expressions in SR and cast the resultant expression
in the ring of polynoms in x00,..x33.
BTW, you don't ha
14 matches
Mail list logo
