Re: [sage-support] Re: Mathematically naive (and incorrect) output

2014-08-01 Thread Jesús TC
Thanks a lot, John! (and sorry for the delay in answering) I see the point: it is simply undefined. But I do not quite agree with you in that "[one] would not expect a computer algebra system to give the same answers with simple substitutions in the two orders": ideally, I would expect that the a

[sage-support] Re: Clifford Algebras, grrrrrr

2014-08-01 Thread Nils Bruin
On Friday, August 1, 2014 11:23:27 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Have you looked at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15300? This is at > attempt at adding Clifford algebras to Sage. I don't know if it does what > you want, but you should take a look. > Independent of that, I think it's a g

[sage-support] Re: Clifford Algebras, grrrrrr

2014-08-01 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, July 26, 2014 12:21:38 PM UTC-7, Stephen Kauffman wrote: > > I attempted to create a Clifford Algebra for space-time with the gamma > matrices using the FreeAlgebraQuotient in analogy to the example for > constructing a quarternion algebra from the documentation with the code: > H

Re: [sage-support] Re: Clifford Algebras, grrrrrr

2014-08-01 Thread Nils Bruin
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:09:04 PM UTC-7, Stephen Kauffman wrote: > > # examples > cliff_elt = g3*g2*g1*g0 > [ST.free_algebra()(str(cliff_elt)).coefficient(mon) for mon in > ST.monomial_basis()] # st_elt.coefficients() results in error since > it has no such attribute > ST is constructe

Re: [sage-support] Re: Clifford Algebras, grrrrrr

2014-08-01 Thread Stephen Kauffman
caught a bug Integer(ii+nn^2) in MonsMats() should be Integer(ii+2**nn) just happens to work out with nn=4 oops On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Kauffman wrote: > Thanks for the tips. I got rid of the execs. Made it more general to > include non-othogonal generators and metric. Did som