On 7/22/14, Nikos Apostolakis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that there is something in my .emacs that causes this behavior.
> After starting emacs with —no-iniit-file option and then evaluating only the
> sage-related parts of .emacs the problem goes away. I will investigate
> further and let you kno
Hi,
it seems that there is something in my .emacs that causes this behavior.
After starting emacs with --no-iniit-file option and then evaluating only the
sage-related parts of .emacs the problem goes away. I will investigate further
and let you know.
Actually I had to install version 0.11
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:04:14 PM UTC+2, juresco leonard wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Would it be possible to integrate some packages of Anaconda (continuum.io),
> especially Numba, in sage ?
>
Depending on your installation, it should be straight forward to start the
Sage environment via "$ sage
Hello,
Would it be possible to integrate some packages of Anaconda (continuum.io),
especially Numba, in sage ? It's a kind of alternative to cython for
speeding up the calculation by using the GPU and multiple-threads from
Python.
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Léo
--
You received this m
Finally figured out a simple way to embed a pdf stored in the DATA folder
into the notebook:
def embedPdf(fname,width=800,height=400):
dataurl='/'+'/'.join(DATA.split('/')[-5:])
html.iframe(dataurl+fname,width=width,height=width)
Just in case someone finds it useful
Fred
On Monday, May
Finally figure out a simple way to embed a pdf stored in the DATA folder
into the notebook:
def embedPdf(fname,width=800,height=400):
dataurl='/'+'/'.join(DATA.split('/')[-5:])
html.iframe(dataurl+fname,width=width,height=width)
Just in case someone finds it useful
Fred
On Monday, May 1
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 7:23:39 AM UTC-7, William wrote:
>
> From: Bhavin Moriya >
>
> The thing is every time I wanna use it, I have to run this code. Now,
> I just wanna know how do I make it work like the in-built command in
> sage. Like for factoring number 10. I just need to say factor(10
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:04:01 AM UTC-7, Craig E Larson wrote:
>
> I am getting an error that I don't understand for the following definite
> integral.
>
> sage: integral(sqrt(1+(9*cos(3*x)^2)),0,pi/2)
>
> This is definitely real on its domain and under the square-root is always
> positive. Ne
Hi William
is there a function somewhere where I could get the worksheet ID number?
For example my current URL is http://ipaddress:8080/home/admin/14/
Is there a way to get the 14 programatically?
thanks
Fred
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:24:37 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014
> This behavior was on Cloud Sage:
'Sage Version 6.2.rc2, Release Date: 2014-05-04'
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr..
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bhavin Moriya
Date: Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:07 AM
Subject: SAGE
To: William Stein
Dear Sir,
Friend of mine written up following code to generate The Rudin Shapiro Sequence.
def count_11(st):
count = 0
for i in range(len(st)-1):
if st
Hmm. I still can't reproduce this. Can you try upgrading sage_mode to version
0.11?
-Ivan
On Jul 19, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Nikos Apostolakis wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:07:05 PM UTC-4, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Nikos Apostolakis wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
>
On 2014-07-22, Craig E Larson wrote:
> I am getting an error that I don't understand for the following definite
> integral.
>
> sage: integral(sqrt(1+(9*cos(3*x)^2)),0,pi/2)
>
> This is definitely real on its domain and under the square-root is always
> positive. Nevertheless, I get the error:
>
I am getting an error that I don't understand for the following definite
integral.
sage: integral(sqrt(1+(9*cos(3*x)^2)),0,pi/2)
This is definitely real on its domain and under the square-root is always
positive. Nevertheless, I get the error:
"RuntimeError: ECL says: Error executing code in M
On 2014-07-16, slelievre wrote:
> Robert Pollak wrote:
>
> Hello!
>>
>> I see the following wrong results:
>>
>> sage: x<2 and x<1
>> x < 2
>> sage: x<2 or x<1
>> x < 1
>>
>> Is this just a syntax problem? How would I enter this correctly?
>>
>
> The best way to manipulate logical combinati
On 2014-07-16, Juan Grados wrote:
> Dears members,
>
> I trying to solve the next problem. Let be the chain of subspaces
> J1 \subset J2 \subset J3 \subset J4 over the finite field GF(3), where
> dim(J1) = 2, dim(J2) = 4, dim(J3) = 6 and dim(J4)=8. I want extract the
> basis vector of the subspace
16 matches
Mail list logo