Re: [sage-support] BooleanPolynomialRing and degrevlex term order

2014-06-17 Thread Stephen Kauffman
I'll give this a try thanks. In my case in this example then X3 = X[3] = Y[575 - 3] for instance. I was using the polynomial equation with addressing scheme X[i*objects + j] + 1 = 0 to represent the relation i~j is true for some arbitrary relation ~ so I guess that would become X[i*objects + j]

Re: [sage-support] BooleanPolynomialRing and degrevlex term order

2014-06-17 Thread Kannappan Sampath
You can reverse a python list L by doing L[::-1]. So, in this case, you just create the ring with 'degneglex' and reverse the gens list X to get Y say. Then, input the polynomials as if your variables Y[0] to Y[n] instead of the variables X[0] upto X[n]. --Kannappan. On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:3

[sage-support] BooleanPolynomialRing and degrevlex term order

2014-06-17 Thread Stephen Kauffman
I have some code like this: objects = 12 R = BooleanPolynomialRing(objects^2,'X',order='degrevlex') X = R.gens() Then R.quotient_ring(listofpolynomials).gens() take on a particularly simple form that other term orders I've tried like 'lex' and 'degneglex' do not

[sage-support] Re: error in TestSuite(PartitionTuples).run()

2014-06-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
(This is intended as a reply to Andrew's answer.) Based on your answer I realized I must not have set everything up quite right. I installed a fortran library, updated my PATH, and rebooted, and now everything seems to work. Thanks for the help, and sorry for the stupid question... -- You rec

Re: [sage-support] Options for the Sage expand function

2014-06-17 Thread kcrisman
> > That seems like a bug in the _sympy_ conversion, in that it is > discarding that the variables are assumed real. > > Yeah, I believe some sympy conversions are still broken. I'm not very familiar with sympy or I would have done some exploration. See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12345

[sage-support] Re: Error Building sage-6.2: Error installing package mpir-2.6.0.p4

2014-06-17 Thread leif
Yun Peng Lin wrote: I'm trying to build Sage 6.2 (latest version from http://www.sagemath.org/) from the source distribution. After running "make", it built for an hour before failing when trying to build package: mpir-2.6.0.p4. A section of the mpir-2.6.0.p4 log file containing the error is be

[sage-support] Re: error in TestSuite(PartitionTuples).run()

2014-06-17 Thread Andrew
Hi Peter, I think that something must be wrong with your istribution as this works for me: ┌┐ │ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.

[sage-support] Error Building sage-6.2: Error installing package mpir-2.6.0.p4

2014-06-17 Thread Yun Peng Lin
I'm trying to build Sage 6.2 (latest version from http://www.sagemath.org/) from the source distribution. After running "make", it built for an hour before failing when trying to build package: mpir-2.6.0.p4. A section of the mpir-2.6.0.p4 log file containing the error is below. I'm trying to