On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, kcrisman wrote:
for d in range(1,8):
for n in range(1,d):
print n/d
0
0
Just to make it clear, range(1,7) gives Python ints, while [1..7] gives
Sage Integers.
In general one can also cast to right type and say
print Integer(n)/d
or
print 1*n/d
I guess th
Thanks John and Robert for your suggestions. I'll definitely fill a bug
against maxima
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:36:20 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:58:51 PM UTC-7, jorges wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 01:24:25 UTC-3, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that the issue is that your integrand simplifies when q=1
>>> -- a
On 2014-04-16, jorges wrote:
> Indeed, that looks good. I still don't understand what you mean by "the
> symbolic integration is not valid when q=1". I would think substituting
> before or after should not make a difference.
Well, if they're not the same, that's a bug in Maxima. If you have ti
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:58:51 PM UTC-7, jorges wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 01:24:25 UTC-3, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> I'm guessing that the issue is that your integrand simplifies when q=1 --
>> at least one term becomes zero -- but you do the integral before doing this
>> sim
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 01:24:25 UTC-3, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that the issue is that your integrand simplifies when q=1 --
> at least one term becomes zero -- but you do the integral before doing this
> simplification. Maybe the symbolic integration is not valid when q=1. If
I'm guessing that the issue is that your integrand simplifies when q=1 --
at least one term becomes zero -- but you do the integral before doing this
simplification. Maybe the symbolic integration is not valid when q=1. If
you plug in the parameters before integrating, you get something very
di
Hi,
Some time ago I translated the derivation of a problem from MAPLE to SAGE.
It took some time but I got it all working, until last week I found some
strange results for a specific value of one of the parameters. Basically
MAPLE and SAGE agree on all but one of the values I tried for parameter
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 8:39:04 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Bassie >
> wrote:
> > I'm running a double for loop, and dividing one over the other.
> Sagecloud
> > converts these fractions to 0, just like python2, but isn't it exactly
> what
> > it's not s
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Bassie wrote:
> I'm running a double for loop, and dividing one over the other. Sagecloud
> converts these fractions to 0, just like python2, but isn't it exactly what
> it's not supposed to do.
> """
> for d in range(1,8):
> for n in range(1,d):
> prin
I'm running a double for loop, and dividing one over the other. Sagecloud
converts these fractions to 0, just like python2, but isn't it exactly what
it's not supposed to do.
"""
for d in range(1,8):
for n in range(1,d):
print n/d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
etc.
"""
--
You received this messag
Thank you Peter and Volker for all the help! I actually forgot about this
one until I had to look this up again!
-KnS
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Peter Bruin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm also a git beginner, so the experts should correct me if there is a
> better way, but what I normally do in
leif wrote:
leun...@gene.com wrote:
Q2: I tried to follow the online sage tutorial
(http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_algebra.html). The session
of using maxima to do laplace transform. I copied the exact command
de1 = maxima("2*diff(x(t),t, 2) + 6*x(t) - 2*y(t)")
lde1 = de1.lapla
leun...@gene.com wrote:
Q2: I tried to follow the online sage tutorial
(http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_algebra.html). The session
of using maxima to do laplace transform. I copied the exact command
de1 = maxima("2*diff(x(t),t, 2) + 6*x(t) - 2*y(t)")
lde1 = de1.laplace("t","s");
as far as I know sage does not runs on windows directly. You need to
install virtual box https://www.virtualbox.org/ and then download the sage
image http://www.sagemath.org/download-windows.html and run in inside
virtual box.
A whole bunch of tutorial showing how to use virtual box are found i
Jori Mantysalo wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, William Stein wrote:
That said, even if we plan to update it, for now I think we should
delete the openssl spkg asap anyways, since it contains the
vulnerability. - - it is now gone.
So what should one do to existing installations? After removing sev
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, William Stein wrote:
That said, even if we plan to update it, for now I think we should
delete the openssl spkg asap anyways, since it contains the
vulnerability. - - it is now gone.
So what should one do to existing installations? After removing several
*ssl* files and d
Hi,
Q1: Can anyone tell me how to install the latest sage on window 7? I am
using virtual box with sage 5.1.3 This is the latest version posted on the
sage math website link for window installation. If I want to use the
6.1.1, what can I do? I have only used window with no programming
exp
18 matches
Mail list logo
