On 2014-02-10, Erik Quaeghebeur wrote:
> op 09-02-14 19:12, john_perry_usm schreef:
>>
>> Actually, I was thinking of doing it when I have time. This should be quite
>> useful for what I need, but I wanted to investigate just how he's going
>> about it.
>>
>> And, as you point out, it isn't a prob
op 09-02-14 19:12, john_perry_usm schreef:
Actually, I was thinking of doing it when I have time. This should be quite
useful for what I need, but I wanted to investigate just how he's going
about it.
And, as you point out, it isn't a problem to add a feature that works with
only one solver; we
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:28:10 PM UTC-5, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> On 2/8/14 11:39 AM, Ken Levasseur wrote:
> > I just converted a Sage notebook to a web page with several sage cells.
>
> By the way, do you have a script to do this? I'm sure others would be
> interested in such a thing.
Jan Groenewald prepared a PPA for Sage 6.1.1, see his post on sage-release:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-release/qhQ2BPM34Z0/kmneDmNsuroJ
tdumont wrote:
> Will there be a ppa version of 6.0 ?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-suppo
> And, as you point out, it isn't a problem to add a feature that works with
> only one solver; we simply add an optional argument (or more), right?
Well, if it boils down to the addition of an optional argument
somewhere this would be a very easy way out :-)
Anyway, we have no reason to stop our
