Re: [sage-support] Re: Text representation of number fields with embeddings

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 6:22:30 PM UTC-4, Emil wrote: > Thanks, Volker. I must say I find the K. syntax makes me feel a bit > uneasy. Is there a way to do > > sage: x = polygen(QQ) > sage: K. = NumberField(x^2 + x - 1/2, embedding=0.366) > > in straight Python? > Not straight Python, i

Re: [sage-support] Re: Text representation of number fields with embeddings

Thanks, Volker. I must say I find the K. syntax makes me feel a bit uneasy. Is there a way to do sage: x = polygen(QQ) sage: K. = NumberField(x^2 + x - 1/2, embedding=0.366) in straight Python? On 28 July 2013 04:13, Volker Braun wrote: > The K.<> = ... syntax injects a names=(...) k

[sage-support] Re: Integration of formal functions

Comments and (horrible !) workaround in Trac#14976 . HTH, Emmanuel Charpentier [ Snip ... ] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s