On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Dr Avishek Adhikari
wrote:
> Dear Professor stein,
> I am an user of Sage. I was also a member of
> "sage-support@googlegroups.com". But mistakenly, I made
> "unsubscription to sage-support". I want to rejoin the group. Please
> let me know what to do.
You migh
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 5:51:24 PM UTC-5, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Probably because the top level of your file system is named "atlas", and
> Atlas stands somewhere in Africa with the world on his shoulders. Sage
> builds its documentation partially based on aspects of Greek mythology.
>
LOL
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3:07:54 PM UTC-7, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> When I finished building Sage on my Ubuntu 10.0something, I got the
> message,
>
> Build finished. The built documents can be found in
> /atlas/sage-5.0/devel/sage/doc/output/html/tr/a_tour_of_sage
>
> I went
On 2012-05-29, john_perry_usm wrote:
> --=_Part_692_18243908.1338329274060
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello
>
> When I finished building Sage on my Ubuntu 10.0something, I got the message,
>
> Build finished. The built documents can be found in
> /atlas/sage-5.0/d
Hello
When I finished building Sage on my Ubuntu 10.0something, I got the message,
Build finished. The built documents can be found in
/atlas/sage-5.0/devel/sage/doc/output/html/tr/a_tour_of_sage
I went to that page, and the first thing I saw was,
Hesap Makinesi Olarak Sage
Funny. Ho
Martin Albrecht writes:
> On Thursday 24 May 2012, Oleksandr Kazymyrov wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In manual "ZZ ?" you can find:
>>
>> As an inverse to "digits()", lists of digits are accepted, provided
>>that you give a base. The lists are interpreted in little-endian
>>order, so
On 2012-05-28, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Simon King writes:
>> Anyway, because of the change to the new google groups, I would actually
>> have stopped contributing to sage-support. Fortunately, sage-support,
>> sage-devel, sage-combinat-devel and sage-release are also available in
>> gmane. See, for
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Oleksandr Kazymyrov
wrote:
> I have encountered the following problem In Sage 5.0:
> sage: R.=ZZ[]
> sage: k=GF(2^8,name='a',modulus=x^8+x^4+x^3+x+1)
> sage: k(ZZ(3).digits(2))
> a + 1
> sage: k.gen()^ZZ(k(ZZ(3).digits(2)).log_repr())
> a
> sage: k.gen()^ZZ(k
Hi,
On 2012-05-29, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> sage: k.some_elements ?
>> ...
>>Returns a collection of elements of this finite field *for use
>> in unit testing.*
>
> The function is indeed used in unitests as confirmed by
> search_src("some_elements"). Perhaps it should start with an un
Hi,
On Monday 21 May 2012, Oleksandr Kazymyrov wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> 1. Why important next functions?
> k.a_times_b_minus_c
> k.a_times_b_plus_c
> k.c_minus_a_times_b
These shouldn't exist I'd say. The reason they do exist is that when I wrapped
Givaro it provided these functions so I figured
On Thursday 24 May 2012, Oleksandr Kazymyrov wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In manual "ZZ ?" you can find:
>
> As an inverse to "digits()", lists of digits are accepted, provided
>that you give a base. The lists are interpreted in little-endian
>order, so that entry "i" of the list is t
Hi,
it seems I was wrong about this yesterday (Olexandr and I discussed in person
yesterday):
sage: K.gen?
Return a generator of self. All elements x of self are expressed as
log_{self.gen()}(p) internally.
This generator might differ between different runs or differen
12 matches
Mail list logo
