On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Mel wrote:
> Perhaps I should clarify a couple more things:
>
> I have figured out how to do simple Macaulay 2 commands inside a sage
> script as follows:
>
> macaulay2("S = ZZ/101[t_1 .. t_9, u_1 .. u_9]")
>
> However, many of my commands are not working.
Use t
Perhaps I should clarify a couple more things:
I have figured out how to do simple Macaulay 2 commands inside a sage
script as follows:
macaulay2("S = ZZ/101[t_1 .. t_9, u_1 .. u_9]")
However, many of my commands are not working. The code in Macaulay2
which I would like to execute from sage loo
Hello,
I'm familiar with running just Macaulay2 from the sage notebook.
However, I now have a task that requires me to execute a bunch of sage
code to calculate an ideal, call some Macaulay2 functions on that
ideal, and then return to the sage script to do some more
calculations. Is it possible t
On 7/25/11 12:29 PM, Dox wrote:
Hi again.
I've seen the documentation for plot. However, the last of the points I
highlight seems to be not possible.
It is, but you have to follow the pointers in the documentation to the
further documentation in matplotlib. In the Sage documentation for
tic
Apparently, this is caused by a problem in degree() which is used in
polynomial(). In your example:
sage: pol2.degree(q)
0
sage: pol2.degree(p)
3
You get the expected behavior if you bring q into pol2.parent()
explicitly:
sage: q=pol2.parent()(q)
sage: pol2.degree(q),pol2.polynomial(q)
(3, 4*q^3
Hello all,
I don´t know if the following is an error in the implementation of the
method polynomial
or if I am using it in a way that is not intended, but it seems that
the use of the method
polynomial changes when I am in a polynomial ring with 2 or with 3
variables.
pol and pol2 are the "same"
Hi again.
I've seen the documentation for plot. However, the last of the points I
highlight seems to be not possible.
I'd like to change the numerical ticks (1,2,3,4) by alphabetical ones (eta,
xi, lambda, rho).
Thank you
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
Is the syntax for this class
t = new_exp(SR, symbolic_expression)?
So that sage: t returns symbolic_expression?
Second, I'm not entirely sure I understand how this patch was made,
let alone how to install it. I skimmed over
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/patching_spkgs.html and
http://www
Hi John,
see attachment. You'll have to change the cinclude path for it to work on your
machine.
On Monday 25 July 2011, john_perry_usm wrote:
> On Jul 25, 6:46 am, Martin Albrecht
>
> wrote:
> > You'll need to compile your extension module (i.e. your pyx file) with
> > C++ instead of C. See
>
On 7/24/11 5:36 PM, Dox wrote:
Hi people,
I have a little doubt about ticks in plots. I'd like to know whether the
following tasks are possible:
* eliminate all ticks of a plot.
* eliminate the dependent variable ticks.
* changing the number by letter, either 1 by \eta and 2 by 2\et
On Jul 25, 6:46 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> You'll need to compile your extension module (i.e. your pyx file) with C++
> instead of C. See
>
> http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_in_cython.html#special-pragmas
>From that link, I understood that I need to prepend
# clang: C++
to the f
On Monday 25 July 2011, john_perry_usm wrote:
> Thanks, William.
>
> I don't know why I didn't try cimport on that other example; that
> certainly works with Rational.
>
> But I shouldn't have simplified the example to that level. What I
> *really* want to cdef is MPolynomial_libsingular. Somethi
Thanks, William.
I don't know why I didn't try cimport on that other example; that
certainly works with Rational.
But I shouldn't have simplified the example to that level. What I
*really* want to cdef is MPolynomial_libsingular. Something like this:
from sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomi
13 matches
Mail list logo
