This is already mentioned here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-support@googlegroups.com/msg20832.html
(It seems from that thread that this may not be a problem with Sage
itself.)
It should be reported as a bug if it hasn't been already.
On May 17, 12:20 pm, tvn wrote:
> shouldn't this be take
On Tue, 17 May 2011 at 12:58PM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> If we are able to integrate Geogebra into Sage (there is proof of
> concept, the details remain!), that would provide a way to create
> standalone Java applets from Sage for the things Geogebra does. Of
> course, you could also use Geogebra; y
On May 17, 2:52 pm, Rolf wrote:
> Hello,
> I just learned that @interact provides a fantastic tool to test
> mathematical models. I understand that these interactive frames are
> some sort of Java applets. I wonder If there is a way to export these
No, they are not - it's javascript, plus a rou
Hello,
I just learned that @interact provides a fantastic tool to test
mathematical models. I understand that these interactive frames are
some sort of Java applets. I wonder If there is a way to export these
applets and to make it usable on an ordinary webpage.
I know a similar question has been
shouldn't this be taken care of automatically ?
sage: solve([x == 0, x== 1],x,solution_dict=True)
...
IndexError: list index out of range
sage: solve([x == 0, x== 1],x)
[]
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 05/17/11 09:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I'd like to add some simple assumptions, e.g.
>
> assume(x > 0)
> assume(y > 0)
> ...
>
> to the top of a Python file and have them used in all symbolic
> calculations that follow. But, they don't seem to take hold like they do
> from within the
I'd like to add some simple assumptions, e.g.
assume(x > 0)
assume(y > 0)
...
to the top of a Python file and have them used in all symbolic
calculations that follow. But, they don't seem to take hold like they do
from within the Sage prompt.
Is there a way to make it do what I want?
--
Hi Santanu,
On 16 Mai, 16:27, Santanu Sarkar wrote:
> I have three polynomials
> f=x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 1
> g= x^2+2*y*z
> h= (y+z+2*x)^2+2*x^2 -1.
>
> I want to find the common roots in real.
> What should be approach in complex?
I was hoping that more competent people would answer first (I don't
