Hello list,
Version: sage 4.6.1
I'm quite a newbie with Sage but I'm really impressed this powerful
software.
Since an hour, I'm on a stupid problem:
sage: sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)
sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)
sage: sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-sqrt(6)
sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-sqrt(6)
I would expect sqrt(6) and 0...
I try with the command
Hello,
Version: sage 4.6.1
I'm quite a newbie with Sage but I'm really impressed by this powerful software.
Since an hour, I'm on a stupid problem:
sage: sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)
sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)
sage: sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-sqrt(6)
sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-sqrt(6)
I would expect results sqrt(6) and 0...
I try with the
If I type (x+1)^2
the output is (x+1)^2
If I type z=ComplexField(50)['z'].0; (z+1)^2
the output is z^2 + 2.0*z + 1.0
1) Why the difference (keeping it factored vs multiplying it out)?
2) I would like to be able to keep arbitrary-precision complex
polynomials in their fact
Hi Joal,
On 26 Jan., 08:06, ancienthart wrote:
> My current path of research involves giving the Matrix class a __getattr__
> method with argument *missing_method*, that returns a callable object. The
> callable object then returns the matrix result of .apply_map(lambda x:
> getattr(x,*missing_me
My current path of research involves giving the Matrix class a __getattr__
method with argument *missing_method*, that returns a callable object. The
callable object then returns the matrix result of .apply_map(lambda x:
getattr(x,*missing_method*))
Still having some fun ironing out the wrinkle
On 1/25/11 7:12 PM, A. Jorge Garcia wrote:
From: Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:17 PM, calcp...@aol.com
wrote:
Hello All!
First of all, thanx for all the great work you do making SAGE such a
great resource. My students and I love it!
I've used online SAGE servers and SAGE l
From: Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:17 PM, calcp...@aol.com
wrote:
Hello All!
First of all, thanx for all the great work you do making SAGE such a
great resource. My students and I love it!
I've used online SAGE servers and SAGE live Linux CDs over the years
in class and at
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:17 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> First of all, thanx for all the great work you do making SAGE such a
> great resource. My students and I love it!
>
> I've used online SAGE servers and SAGE live Linux CDs over the years
> in class and at conferences. I re
Hello All!
First of all, thanx for all the great work you do making SAGE such a
great resource. My students and I love it!
I've used online SAGE servers and SAGE live Linux CDs over the years
in class and at conferences. I recently started using the 32bit SAGE
binary for Ubuntu 10.04 Desktop an
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:29:38 -0600
Ryan Krauss wrote:
> Would it be possible to check for a user defined environment variable
> (say SAGE_PYTHOPATH) and append it to PYTHONPATH in sage-env if it is
> defined (I have never really bothered to learn bash programming).
The SAGE_PATH variable is used
If you're getting X11 windows and dialogs instead of Apple's Aqua
interface, you probably have non-Apple Tcl and Tk Frameworks
installed. To solve the problem you can just remove the non-Apple Tcl
& Tk frameworks and reinstall SAGE. SAGE will pick up the Apple Tcl &
Tk frameworks and thereafter u
> I'd ask on the (Mac)Python lists to see if anyone knows how to compile
> Python to get the native tk dialogs instead of X11.
>
> - Robert
I did that, Robert, and I've posted the solution in a separate thread
on this support group. Thanks for your help. I give you credit in my
post.
-- Lou Pe
tvn wrote:
> I am not familiar with Maxima at all so even it has the FM method,
> how likely will it be available in Sage ?There are several
All of Maxima is in Sage. So you could use Maxima directly, through
sage: maxima_console()
or you could send Maxima commands in Sage but have them co
Thanks. That makes sense for installing third party packages. But it
seems like my hack is the only way to use my own packages (which are
continually under development and I don't install them).
Would it be possible to check for a user defined environment variable
(say SAGE_PYTHOPATH) and appen
Hi Ryan,
On 25 Jan., 13:25, Ryan Krauss wrote:
> So, is there a supported way for the user to append paths to the
> PYTHONPATH in the Sage installation (sage-env)?
AFAIK, it is not supported to work with your system-wide Python from
within Sage.
Hence, the supported way of using a Python packag
On Jan 25, 12:16 am, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On Jan 23, 11:47 pm, tvn wrote:
>
> > hi, just wondering if the Fourier-Motzkin algorithm for eliminating
> > variable from a system of linear inequalities is implemented somewhere in
> > Sage ?
>
> Well, Maxima has the function fourier_elim. I don't
So, is there a supported way for the user to append paths to the
PYTHONPATH in the Sage installation (sage-env)?
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ryan Krauss wrote:
>> but I am assuming there has to be a better way.
>
> When you
17 matches
Mail list logo
