[sage-support] New Magma Calculator Interface - magma_free() needs update

2010-12-11 Thread Ugur
As the layout of Magma's website have changed, the code for magma_free() should be updated. Just want to bring to your attention. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more

Re: [sage-support] Interfacing with Pari

2010-12-11 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2010-12-11 20:24, victor wrote: > I work with 'Sage Version 4.6, Release Date: 2010-10-30' on a Mac OS X > 10.6.5. > > I have some problems interfacing with Pari, probably due to my > inexperience. Could you please tell me why do I get the errors below? The problem with what you are doing is t

[sage-support] Interfacing with Pari

2010-12-11 Thread victor
I work with 'Sage Version 4.6, Release Date: 2010-10-30' on a Mac OS X 10.6.5. I have some problems interfacing with Pari, probably due to my inexperience. Could you please tell me why do I get the errors below? sage: E = pari('ellinit([0,0,1,-1,0])') sage: pari('a=ellan(E,1000)') -

[sage-support] Re: Confused about rmul and lmul

2010-12-11 Thread Jason Grout
On 12/11/10 11:27 AM, Niles wrote: On Dec 10, 10:36 pm, Kwankyu wrote: Hi, Below is a passage in the Reference manual on the coercion model: ... r * s gets handled as s._rmul_(r) sage: s=1/2*x;parent(s) sage: s._rmul_? ... Definition: s._rmul_(self, right) Docstring: File: sage/ri

[sage-support] Re: Confused about rmul and lmul

2010-12-11 Thread Niles
On Dec 10, 10:36 pm, Kwankyu wrote: > Hi, > > Below is a passage in the Reference manual on the coercion model: > > ... r * s gets > handled as s._rmul_(r) > > sage: s=1/2*x;parent(s) > sage: s._rmul_? > ... > Definition:     s._rmul_(self, right) > Docstring: >     File: sage/rings/polynomial/p

[sage-support] Re: Confused about rmul and lmul

2010-12-11 Thread Simon King
Hi, On 11 Dez., 04:36, Kwankyu wrote: > Below is a passage in the Reference manual on the coercion model: > > If R is the base of S (as in the first example), simply implement > _rmul_ and/or _lmul_ on the Elements of S. In this case r * s gets > handled as s._rmul_(r) and s * r as s._lmul_(r). >