Let a, b,c be the length of three sides of a triangle.
How can I draw the triangle using Sage?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
htt
On 27 čnc, 23:45, Katie Johnson wrote:
> The problem comes from when I try to add the simple command $
> \sage{2+2}$ to the beginning of the document (right after \maketitle,
> for example). Then I get a very strange error:
>
> ! Missing \endgroup inserted.
>
> \endgroup
> l.417
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Luis Finotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an algorithm that has pieces that perform computations on Z/
> p^i*Z for different values of i. I can count the operations for each
> piece, but to have an overall complexity, I need to know how the
> difference pieces compare.
I've spent most of two days trying to get SageTeX to integrate
properly with TeXShop (including re-installing all of Sage), but I'm
still having some trouble. I haven't gotten farther than compiling
the example that comes with SageTeX (in the texmf -> tex -> generic ->
sagetex folder). Without ch
Hi,
I have an algorithm that has pieces that perform computations on Z/
p^i*Z for different values of i. I can count the operations for each
piece, but to have an overall complexity, I need to know how the
difference pieces compare.
So, can anyone tell me how many bit operations are performed, i
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Simon King wrote:
> On 27 Jul., 21:30, Simon King wrote:
>> Is there no workaround? Say, defining the "method" (or slot method
>> wrapper envelop whatever) and explicitly assign an attribute __doc__
>> to it?
>
> For the record:
> AttributeError: attribute '__doc_
On 27 Jul., 21:30, Simon King wrote:
> Is there no workaround? Say, defining the "method" (or slot method
> wrapper envelop whatever) and explicitly assign an attribute __doc__
> to it?
For the record:
AttributeError: attribute '__doc__' of 'method-wrapper' objects is not
writable
--
To post to
Hi Robert,
On 27 Jul., 21:55, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> While I
> would like to be able to introspect functions such as __pow__, I don't
> think it's always the best place to put documentation (only power
> users will know to check there) and not worth significant performance
> penalties for all
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Dear Robert,
>
> On 27 Jul., 19:55, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> This is actually very related to
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c97d36...
>
> So, the fact that RingElement uses the category framework means
Dear Robert,
On 27 Jul., 19:55, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> This is actually very related to
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c97d36...
So, the fact that RingElement uses the category framework means that
both the code *and* the documentation are hidden behind laye
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a Cython class COCH that inherits from RingElement. I define a
> method __pow__ for it, and it gets some doc string (which means
> tests).
>
> I thought that such method would be a class_method or whatever.
> Instead, I get
> sage
Hi!
I have a Cython class COCH that inherits from RingElement. I define a
method __pow__ for it, and it gets some doc string (which means
tests).
I thought that such method would be a class_method or whatever.
Instead, I get
sage: COCH.__pow__
sage: type(COCH.__pow__)
And what's worse, I seem
On Jul 26, 4:42 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 04:17:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 26, 3:45 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
> > > On 07/26/2010 01:24:34 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 26, 12:59 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
> > > > > sage: version()
> > > > > 'Sage Version
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 at 03:05AM -0700, Daniel Woodhouse wrote:
> I have installed Sage4.5 binaries onto my 64bit Ubuntu10.04LTS,
> following the instructions given: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SAGE.
> I am going to be using it for development, but when I rebuild sage
> using $sage -b I get th
Simon
Thanks for sending so much great info.
Alec
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL
Hi Alec!
Sage has categories, to some extent. But by far not enough!
For instance, currently there is no framework to construct an actual
functor: The existing functors in Sage take an object and create a new
object out of it -- but they do *not* take a morphism and create a new
morphism out of i
I have installed Sage4.5 binaries onto my 64bit Ubuntu10.04LTS,
following the instructions given: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SAGE.
I am going to be using it for development, but when I rebuild sage
using $sage -b I get the following error:
$ sage
---
> It sounds like you are just wanting an order on the edges. If you can
> easily compute the index of an edge, you're set (that's the coordinate of
> the edge). However, if your problem does not lend itself to that, it sounds
> like the easiest thing to do is to maintain dicts to map between an e
On 7/25/10 3:49 PM, Maurizio wrote:
hi all,
I was trying to animate a plot, with only few frames (50).
I get a very slow animate:
from numpy import linspace
t_vec = linspace(0,Tn,50)
L = Graphics()
v = []
tp = []
Xp = []
Yp = []
for tn in t_vec:
tp.append(tn)
Xp.append(X.subs(val_dict)
On 7/27/10 1:41 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody
I have a small problems with graphs => I would like to be able to talk
about a Z/2Z vector space defined over its edges (any set of edges is
independent)
Of course I can just create a Z/2Z vector space of dimension G.size()
(number
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Drenwal,
>
> On 25 Jul., 10:52, drenwal wrote:
>> But, I would prefer to use a more mathematical notation, like Y[k] or
>> y...@k or whatever non already used symbol instead of Ac(y,k).
>
> As Johannes has pointed out, Y[k] is already used,
Hello everybody
I have a small problems with graphs => I would like to be able to talk
about a Z/2Z vector space defined over its edges (any set of edges is
independent)
Of course I can just create a Z/2Z vector space of dimension G.size()
(number of edges), but this would later mean that I
Hi Drenwal,
On 25 Jul., 10:52, drenwal wrote:
> But, I would prefer to use a more mathematical notation, like Y[k] or
> y...@k or whatever non already used symbol instead of Ac(y,k).
As Johannes has pointed out, Y[k] is already used, so, this might not
be what you want. But, if it is, overwrite
23 matches
Mail list logo
