[sage-support] Re: Problem finding numeric eigenvectors

2010-06-06 Thread Rob Beezer
On Jun 6, 9:05 am, Mike Witt wrote: > This does kind of reinforce the concept, which I guess I've > heard expressed before here, that you have to be prepared > to update your sage build very frequently in order to keep > up with things. Exactly. ;-) But with sage -upgrade at a system prompt,

[sage-support] Re: latex \cancel not rendering

2010-06-06 Thread Rob Beezer
Mike, Thanks for having a look. I hope to get back to this and tidy it up in the next few weeks. (2) This all seems more complicated in the notebook (with jsMath, etc), and I do think most folks begin in the notebook. If you like the command-line (I do too), then you don't need as much guidance

[sage-support] Re: Support for elliptic curves over rings?

2010-06-06 Thread Alasdair
I haven't put the patch through all possible tests, but for my purposes: defining an elliptic curve over the ring Z_n with n=p*q, it works very well. I can experiment with the Koyama et al RSA-type elliptic curve cryptosystem: sage: p=next_prime(randint(500,1000));p%3 2 sage: q=next_prime(randint

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage to run automatically in CLI

2010-06-06 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:51 PM, clinton bowen wrote: > I'm sorry, but neither of these methods are working for me.  I've > tried both ways and I cannot get sage to run in command line nicely > > are there any other ways to do this? You might not understand the basics of how the UNIX PATH works?

[sage-support] Re: Sage to run automatically in CLI

2010-06-06 Thread clinton bowen
Does it make a difference if I compiled sage 4.4.2? On May 30, 11:24 am, Mike Hansen wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM,clinton bowen wrote: > > How do i get sage to run automatically in ubuntu?  I would like to be > > able to just type 'sage' into command line and it run automatically. I

[sage-support] Re: Sage to run automatically in CLI

2010-06-06 Thread clinton bowen
I'm sorry, but neither of these methods are working for me. I've tried both ways and I cannot get sage to run in command line nicely are there any other ways to do this? On May 30, 11:24 am, Mike Hansen wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM,clinton bowen wrote: > > How do i get sage to run

Re: [sage-support] Re: latex \cancel not rendering

2010-06-06 Thread Mike Witt
On 06/06/2010 10:28:43 AM, Rob Beezer wrote: I'm working on a guide. Still in *very* rough draft stage, but might be readable in Trac (just click on the version 2 patch). Feedback welcome. Here is some feedback: (1) This is very useful. I just read through it and learned some things that I

[sage-support] Re: latex \cancel not rendering

2010-06-06 Thread Rob Beezer
I'm working on a guide. Still in *very* rough draft stage, but might be readable in Trac (just click on the version 2 patch). Feedback welcome. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9027 On Jun 6, 9:33 am, dbjohn wrote: > Is there any links or guides that could show me how to extend the >

[sage-support] Re: latex \cancel not rendering

2010-06-06 Thread dbjohn
Is there any links or guides that could show me how to extend the latex capabilities of Sage. Would it be very complicated? On Jun 6, 4:55 pm, Rob Beezer wrote: > The Sage notebook uses jsMath to render mathematics.  jsMath only > implements a (large) subset of TeX, so it is likely that \cancel i

Re: [sage-support] Re: Problem finding numeric eigenvectors

2010-06-06 Thread Mike Witt
On 06/06/2010 08:45:53 AM, Rob Beezer wrote: Yes, there were changes, including the output format, as of 4.4 (about 7 weeks ago). See "eigenmatrix_right totally broken" at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4756 Rob Ahh, well that explains some things. I had been watching: http://tra

[sage-support] Re: latex \cancel not rendering

2010-06-06 Thread Rob Beezer
The Sage notebook uses jsMath to render mathematics. jsMath only implements a (large) subset of TeX, so it is likely that \cancel is not part of its capabilities. You can see much of what is possible at: http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/symbols/welcome.html Rob On Jun 6, 4:31 am, dbjohn

[sage-support] Re: Problem finding numeric eigenvectors

2010-06-06 Thread Rob Beezer
Yes, there were changes, including the output format, as of 4.4 (about 7 weeks ago). See "eigenmatrix_right totally broken" at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4756 Rob On Jun 6, 7:27 am, Mike Witt wrote: > Has something changed recently. I'm running v.4.3.5 > > [m...@vector ~]$ sage

Re: [sage-support] Re: Problem finding numeric eigenvectors

2010-06-06 Thread Mike Witt
Has something changed recently. I'm running v.4.3.5 [m...@vector ~]$ sage -- | Sage Version 4.3.5, Release Date: 2010-03-28 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| --

[sage-support] Set and set comparaisons

2010-06-06 Thread iDan
Hi! With Python sets E1 = set( [1,2] ) E2 = set( [1,2,3] ) Sage return true for E1 < E2 #E1 is a proper subset of E2 and return true for E2 > E1 #E2 is a proper superset of E1 But with Sage Sets E1 = Set( [1,2] ) E2 = Set( [1,2,3] ) Sage return true for E1 < E2 but return ***fa

[sage-support] latex \cancel not rendering

2010-06-06 Thread dbjohn
I only recently discovered the latex \cancel command but it is not rendering on the sage online version I am using. Other latex command such as \frac, \times etc are working. Is this command available in sage's latex abilities, do I need to install a package perhaps? -- To post to this group, sen