On 4 June 2010 23:03, Dmitri wrote:
> ISSUE RESOLVED
>
>
> I think I've figured out the problem: I had the wrong binaries
> installed (32-bit instead of the actualy 64-bit). This is also
> noticeable in the error messge when it mentions LONG_BIT bad for
> platform. However, this wasn't completely
Just applied the patch (thanks to some help!) and it works fine.
cheers,
Alasdair
On Jun 5, 8:21 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Alasdair wrote:
> > Thanks! At the moment, if I enter:
>
> > sage: N = 171576151
> > sage: E = EllipticCurve(Integers(N),[3,-13])
> > sage
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Alasdair wrote:
> Thanks! At the moment, if I enter:
>
> sage: N = 171576151
> sage: E = EllipticCurve(Integers(N),[3,-13])
> sage: P = E(2,1)
>
> I obtain a NotImplementedError. So I should apply this patch, or
> write my own routines? (I can implement arithmeti
Thanks! At the moment, if I enter:
sage: N = 171576151
sage: E = EllipticCurve(Integers(N),[3,-13])
sage: P = E(2,1)
I obtain a NotImplementedError. So I should apply this patch, or
write my own routines? (I can implement arithmetic on such curves
using projective coordinates.)
-Alasdair
On
ISSUE RESOLVED
I think I've figured out the problem: I had the wrong binaries
installed (32-bit instead of the actualy 64-bit). This is also
noticeable in the error messge when it mentions LONG_BIT bad for
platform. However, this wasn't completely obvious: My Vista is on a 32-
bit operation syste
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Alasdair wrote:
> I was recently exploring the RSA elliptic curve cryptosystem of Koyama
> et al, which uses elliptic curves defined over the ring Z_n, with
> n=p*q (p, q both primes). Does Sage or any of its component systems
> support arithmetic on such curves?
I was recently exploring the RSA elliptic curve cryptosystem of Koyama
et al, which uses elliptic curves defined over the ring Z_n, with
n=p*q (p, q both primes). Does Sage or any of its component systems
support arithmetic on such curves?
Thanks,
Alasdair
--
To post to this group, send email t
On Jun 4, 7:48 am, John Reid wrote:
> Implementing a function that evaluates the multinomial beta seems
> straightforward. I imagine I could do that if pointed in the right
> direction. But did you mean extending maxima so that it knows how to
> integrate dirichlet distributions? I wouldn't know
On 4 June, 16:16, Bruce wrote:
> This is now sorted out - thanks, John
>
> I can now access LiE from the notebook. My worksheet can be seen
> athttps://selmer:8000/home/pub/7/
>
> This uses both LiE and symmetric functions. Not a problem in sage
> but not so easy in rival packages.
Excellent.
On 4 June, 12:03, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> Le 04/06/2010 11:17, John Cremona a crit :> Brilliant suggestion. I
> installed libncurses5-dev and then installing
> > lie worked. (And then I found your message, afterwards).
>
> > Here is an awkward fact: when I run our system-wide install (e.g. o
Wish I could send a patch :), but I'm not that good a python
programmer. I'll try the convert method. Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/30/10 6:41 PM, Jim Ragsdale wrote:
>>
>> I tried something else that a saw online:
>>
>> input:
>> a=matrix(QQ,2,3,[1,2,3, 4,5,6]
This is now sorted out - thanks, John
I can now access LiE from the notebook. My worksheet can be seen at
https://selmer:8000/home/pub/7/
This uses both LiE and symmetric functions. Not a problem in sage
but not so easy in rival packages.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@go
kcrisman wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:58 am, John Reid wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
I'm not sure whether this is really worth a bug report to Maxima
either; what answer were you expecting (a generalized beta function,
maybe) to receive? Perhaps that function does not yet exist in
Maxima. Incidentally, you c
On Jun 4, 3:58 am, John Reid wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether this is really worth a bug report to Maxima
> > either; what answer were you expecting (a generalized beta function,
> > maybe) to receive? Perhaps that function does not yet exist in
> > Maxima. Incidentally, you ca
Whoever reads this...
On Jun 4, 9:02 am, Simon King wrote:
> After printing the ":", the memory consumption increased dramatically
> (according to "top", ecl has eaten it) and my machine died from
> swapping.
>
> Still unable to build 4.4.2 from sources.
In my first two attempts, I interrupted t
Le 04/06/2010 11:17, John Cremona a écrit :
Brilliant suggestion. I installed libncurses5-dev and then installing
lie worked. (And then I found your message, afterwards).
Here is an awkward fact: when I run our system-wide install (e.g. on
the server) the command optional_packages() fails sin
Brilliant suggestion. I installed libncurses5-dev and then installing
lie worked. (And then I found your message, afterwards).
Here is an awkward fact: when I run our system-wide install (e.g. on
the server) the command optional_packages() fails since it is trying
to write a file into /usr/loca
Hi!
Any idea what the message
;;; Note: Invoking external command:
;;; gcc -o "/tmp/ECL001m5g8qU.fas" -L"/home/king/SAGE/sage-4.4.2/
local/lib/" "/tmp/ECL001m5g8qU.o" -shared -L/home/king/SAGE/
sage-4.4.2/local/lib -L/home/king/SAGE/sage-4.4.2/local/lib -lecl -
lgmp -lgc -ldl -lm An error
kcrisman wrote:
I'm not sure whether this is really worth a bug report to Maxima
either; what answer were you expecting (a generalized beta function,
maybe) to receive? Perhaps that function does not yet exist in
Maxima. Incidentally, you can find more information about what
manipulations you ca
19 matches
Mail list logo
