Believe it or not, mpi has been standard on mac for several years and is
pretty solid. I'm with you on the bug reporter. Here's the address (and for
those that don't know it, ADC membership is free so anybody can submit a bug
report):
https://bugreport.apple.com
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:44 AM,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Chris Kees wrote:
> Hey, thanks, that patch fixed it. Yes, I'm on a 64-bit mac. We've had a lot
> of trouble with numpy distutils and fortran on the mac unrelated to sage. I
> was hoping that sage would provide a way to avoid those hassles among other
> things. App
Hey, thanks, that patch fixed it. Yes, I'm on a 64-bit mac. We've had a lot
of trouble with numpy distutils and fortran on the mac unrelated to sage. I
was hoping that sage would provide a way to avoid those hassles among other
things. Apple could make life a hell of a lot easier by including
gfor
Hi Chris,
Are you on a 64-bit mac, i.e. core 2 duo or newer? I believe Sage's
implementation of f2py is broken on 64-bit macs - certainly it is
broken on mine too.
There is a simple patch that fixes this problem at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8010 , if anyone wants to
review it.
U
On 6/1/10 8:57 PM, Vinod wrote:
Yes, matlab does save the images properly to the directory. But the
problem here is to get the image displayed on the web browser itself.
Are you saying that in the Sage notebook:
1. You can use the above code to create a matlab plot and save it to a
specific
Yes, matlab does save the images properly to the directory. But the
problem here is to get the image displayed on the web browser itself.
Thanks,
Vinod
On Jun 1, 4:17 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 6/1/10 5:53 PM, Vinod wrote:
>
> > hello Jason,
>
> > This doesn't work either... :(
> > matlab doesn
On 6/1/10 5:53 PM, Vinod wrote:
hello Jason,
This doesn't work either... :(
matlab doesn't even start with xvfb-run command.
it gives lot of errors.
As William pointed out, is the original problem resolved by one of the
other messages? If not, can you precisely state the problem as it now
On 5/30/10 6:41 PM, Jim Ragsdale wrote:
I tried something else that a saw online:
input:
a=matrix(QQ,2,3,[1,2,3, 4,5,6])
show(a)
output:
looks like what I would expect.
So do NumPy arrays not display like a matrix in the notebook?
That's correct, at least for "show". You could convert
hello Jason,
This doesn't work either... :(
matlab doesn't even start with xvfb-run command.
it gives lot of errors.
~Vinod
On May 28, 6:24 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/28/10 8:08 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Jason Grout
> > wrote:
> >> On 5/28/10 7:47
Did you read the documentation of the function? It makes it quite
clear:
Definition: lcalc.zeros(self, n, L='')
Docstring:
Return the imaginary parts of the first n nontrivial zeros of
the
L-function in the upper half plane, as 32-bit reals.
INPUT:
* ``n`` - inte
On Jun 1, 2010, at 11:05 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Anne Driver wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list, and relatively new to Sage. I'm puzzled by
the
logic of one part of Sage though.
Although I don't have a
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Anne Driver wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am new to this list, and relatively new to Sage. I'm puzzled by the
>> logic of one part of Sage though.
>>
>> Although I don't have access to Mathematica at the minute on t
On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Anne Driver wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list, and relatively new to Sage. I'm puzzled by
the logic of one part of Sage though.
Although I don't have access to Mathematica at the minute on this
computer, I know if I compute the first zero, I get something lik
On 1 June, 14:45, Chris Kees wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build a fortran extension module with f2py using and spkg I've
> built for sage 4.4.2 on Mac OS X 10.6. When I just run 'python setup.py
> install' from the commandline (with SAGE_LOCAL at the front of my path,
> etc.) The module build/
Hello,
I am new to this list, and relatively new to Sage. I'm puzzled by the logic
of one part of Sage though.
Although I don't have access to Mathematica at the minute on this computer,
I know if I compute the first zero, I get something like
In[1] = ZetaZero[1] //N (to get a numerical value)
O
Hi together, I'm trying to install pyhdf to work with NASA's HDF-EOS
files. Unfortunately it does not work, if I follow these instructions:
http://pysclint.sourceforge.net/pyhdf/install.html
So I compiled szlib and hdf4 succesfully and did in the sage shell (I
have sage 4.3.3 and Suse 11.1):
$ ex
Hi,
I'm trying to build a fortran extension module with f2py using and spkg I've
built for sage 4.4.2 on Mac OS X 10.6. When I just run 'python setup.py
install' from the commandline (with SAGE_LOCAL at the front of my path,
etc.) The module build/installs fine, but when in installing as an spkg I
I would like to compute the composition (f o g) where f, g are
polynomial maps from R^2 to R^2. For example, if f(x,y) = (y, y^2 +
x), I would like to obtain
(f o f)(x,y) = (y^2 + x, (y^2 + x)^2 + y)
In Maple the code is more or less :
f := (x,y) -> (y, y^2 + x);
(f...@f)(x,y);
Is there a way to
18 matches
Mail list logo
