Dear all,
I would like to ask you about a problem I am encountering while using
NTL library for p-adic numbers manipulation. Sometimes, I get the
following internal error from NTL function:
"can't grow this _ntl_gbigint"
I saw a partial explanation on the following SAGE documentation page:
http:
On Mar 23, 2010, at 5:44 PM, rvaug...@gmail.com wrote:
Brand-new (3/20/10) 4.3.4 version of SAGE; ran make
on my Scientific Linux 32-bit Scientific Linux PC.
make took a long time, but succeeded.
Took the same brand-new (3/20/10) 4.3.4 version of SAGE, ran make
on my Scientific Linux 64-bit 5.4
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 at 07:25AM -0700, iDan wrote:
> In french, we use comma as decimal separator. How can I convert the
> result of the instruction \sage{} (from sagetex package) ?
I've created http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8594. Hopefully
we'll include support for this in Sage someti
I won't clutter the discussion with the full traceback unless someone
would find it interesting, but the hg_sage command failed with:
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is unsubscriptable.
I did enter the entire URL, I didn't just paste the abbreviated URL
displayed in the post.
On Mar 23, 1:18 am, On
Hi Luis,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:40 AM, finotti wrote:
> Any suggestions?
If you don't want to use the decorator @parallel, you could also try
Parallel Python:
http://www.parallelpython.com
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
Dear Minh,
>
> > OK, I understand that sage do not kown how to evaluate
> > sum(1/(1+k^2), k, -oo, oo)
>
> > But it answer 0 , that is wrong!!!
>
> Both Sage 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 give the same wrong answer:
>
> [mv...@sage sage-4.3.4]$ sage
> ---
Brand-new (3/20/10) 4.3.4 version of SAGE; ran make
on my Scientific Linux 32-bit Scientific Linux PC.
make took a long time, but succeeded.
Took the same brand-new (3/20/10) 4.3.4 version of SAGE, ran make
on my Scientific Linux 64-bit 5.4 server.
There, make fails. Excerpt from install.log:
--
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 at 07:25AM -0700, iDan wrote:
> Hi,
> In french, we use comma as decimal separator. How can I convert the
> result of the instruction \sage{} (from sagetex package) ?
Hrm, unfortunately, I don't think this is possible right now.
You can have Sage insert a comma in this way:
Dear all,
I've been trying to find out if it is possible to run some
computations in parallel. I've seen the documentation of @paralell,
but I *think* it is not what I need.
Here is what I have in mind: I have a function, say, defined
recursively based on the size of the input vector. Something
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Mike wrote:
> I'm using the sage notebook in Firefox on Ubuntu 9.10. I don't know if
> it's just been me but it seems like sage has been a little quirky
> lately.
>
> -mike-
I upgraded sagenb.org to sage-4.3.4 a few days ago, and evidently
"sage -upgrade" doesn't
Hi,
In french, we use comma as decimal separator. How can I convert the
result of the instruction \sage{} (from sagetex package) ?
%!TEX TS-program = sage
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[francais]{babel}
\usepackage{numprint}
\usepackage{
I'm using the sage notebook in Firefox on Ubuntu 9.10. I don't know if
it's just been me but it seems like sage has been a little quirky
lately.
-mike-
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@go
On Mar 23, 2:47 pm, Mike wrote:
> I'm attempting to perform a simple "solve" command ...
Can you please tell us your version of Sage and type of distribution,
your operating system and platform?
H
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
I'm attempting to perform a simple "solve" command but it keeps giving
me the TypeError: Unable to start maxima. Is there any other command I
can use to just solve for a simple missing variable, or do I need to
wait until the situation is resolved? Thanks
-mike-
--
To post to this group, send em
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:09:47 +0100
Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
> I noticed this today, for some mysterious reason integrate returns non
> existing gamma_incomplete instead of gamma_inc, look at:
>
> I'm writing from break between classes so don't have time to browse
> trac for this right now, is t
I noticed this today, for some mysterious reason integrate returns non
existing gamma_incomplete instead of gamma_inc, look at:
[gi...@raven3 ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.4, Release Date: 2010-03-19 |
| Typ
Thanks,
solved my problem!
Cheers,
tobi
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:49:46 +0100
Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
> tk wrote:
>
> > I tried to do some calculations and used a self-defined function.
> > After that, I wanted to change it to another function like sin
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
tk wrote:
> I tried to do some calculations and used a self-defined function.
> After that, I wanted to change it to another function like sin or
> just
> a constant.
> I am using the binary version on Ubuntu Karmic.
>
> What I got was the following:
Hello there,
I recently installed sage on my windows xp machine, using the
instructions on the website:
http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/win/README.txt
I can get sage to work in the virtualbox, however when I open firefox
in windows and type in the ip address I get the following error
message:
---
I tried to do some calculations and used a self-defined function.
After that, I wanted to change it to another function like sin or
just
a constant.
I am using the binary version on Ubuntu Karmic.
What I got was the following:
--
Hi Minh!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:35 AM, G B wrote:
>> Hi Ondrej--
>>
>> Sorry to turn helpless, but I'm not sure how to apply the patch. I'm
>> working from a binary install for OS X.
>
> Here is a quick-and-dirty way. I assum
21 matches
Mail list logo