Hi,
This is an advertisement of a simple script starting and stopping a
Sage server on unix/linux platform, living at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7893
Kwankyu Lee
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Stephen Linton
wrote:
> As far as I can tell, all the relevant code is identical in 4.4.10 + patch
> and 4.4.12. Of course, I may (must, perhaps) have too narrow a definition of
> relevant, but I wonder if its actually a matter of 4.4.10 being lucky in some
> w
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 11:56 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > William,
>> > I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
>> > filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
>> >
On Jan 10, 11:56 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > William,
> > I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
> > filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
> > (so the workspace gets saved, but with a horribly wrong name...)
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> William,
> I think I can reproduce one of your Itanium GAP bug; the workspace
> filename gets mangled by SaveWorkspace.
> (so the workspace gets saved, but with a horribly wrong name...)
> Should be next to trivial to fix...
> Dima
Sweet.
It was an ephemeris that was generated outside of Sage.
On Jan 10, 8:19 am, rickhg12hs wrote:
> Sorry not to address your query, but ...
>
> Is there a satellite ephemeris propagator for sage? ... or does your
> data come from outside sage?
>
> Cheers,
> Richard
>
> On Jan 7, 8:19 pm, Stefan wro
Thanks for the solution!
Shing
On Jan 9, 9:24 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Shing Hing Man wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > First, I define the ring of polynomial over the rationals, S.
> > Then define a polynomial g in S.
> > Is there a simple way to convert g to type
>
Sorry not to address your query, but ...
Is there a satellite ephemeris propagator for sage? ... or does your
data come from outside sage?
Cheers,
Richard
On Jan 7, 8:19 pm, Stefan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm preparing to make a presentation to a few colleagues at work on
> the capabilities of Sag
It would be convenient to filter "solve" output based on "assume". Is
there an easy, generally applicable way to do this?
E.g.,
sage: var('a b t x y')
(a, b, t, x, y)
sage: assume(a>0,b>0,t>0)
sage: assumptions()
[a > 0, b > 0, t > 0]
sage: solve([y==(x^2-1)/2,x==a*t,y==b*t],x,y,t)
[[x == (b + s
The real disappointment is that sage could not solve it.
Aren't there several solutions?
Richard
On Jan 10, 7:01 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Roland!
>
> On 10 Jan., 12:56, Rolandb wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > The following message amazes me, because if an equation is unsolvable
> > I would assume []
Hi Roland!
On 10 Jan., 12:56, Rolandb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following message amazes me, because if an equation is unsolvable
> I would assume [] as output.
>
> ValueError: Unable to solve [x^3 + 3*x^2*y + 3*x*y^2 == 45487, y^3 ==
> 549755813888] for (x, y)
I am not an expert for that part of Sag
Hi,
The following message amazes me, because if an equation is unsolvable
I would assume [] as output.
ValueError: Unable to solve [x^3 + 3*x^2*y + 3*x*y^2 == 45487, y^3 ==
549755813888] for (x, y)
Roland
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
12 matches
Mail list logo
