> > By the way, anything new about moving to the newest GAP version?
>
> Somebody should post a new spkg. Then I'll test it on Itanium and see
> whether or not it works. If not, then it doesn't go in, but we can at
> least report the problem again to the GAP list.
William,
I emailed you few weeks
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to say thanks to whoever implemented the per-cell
horizontal scroll bar in 4.2--it makes my life a little easier!
There were a number of people involved. I believe this is the ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6939
Please let us k
Hi,
at first I want to thank you very much for sage which is a great piece
of software; it was for long time my wish to have an open source math
system.
I am currently running sage via the sage-mode emacs interface (emacs 23
under a debian testing kde 4 environment). However, I have with this
in
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 9, 12:17 am, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Well Sage is a bit different than this because you'd want the full set
>> >> > of tools for easy porting of SPK
On Jan 9, 12:17 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>
>
>
> wrote:
> >> > Well Sage is a bit different than this because you'd want the full set
> >> > of tools for easy porting of SPKGs -- bash, tar, make, gcc, ...
>
> >> well, that's if you want to
On 8 led, 10:47, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2010, YeChuan Xu wrote:
>
> > Hi, everyone,
>
> > My system is Debian 5.0.3, and cpu is 64-bit.
> > I can't find the precompiled version for debian.
> > Does that for Ubuntu work for my case?
>
> I'd say there is a good chance that t
On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:10 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
For the record, this was already tried (using a combination of .bat
files
and standalone javascript). The problem is that even fewer people
understood/were familiar with this build sys
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>
> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> In fact, I
On Jan 8, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running
Cygwin
(or Mingw - a clone
Hi all,
I just wanted to say thanks to whoever implemented the per-cell
horizontal scroll bar in 4.2--it makes my life a little easier!
Thanks,
Alan
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googl
>
> Anyway, Dima, thanks for sorting my position that a Cygwin port of
> Sage would be very valuable indeed!
+1. All this time I assumed that Cygwin would require the same
convolutions as the current VM or VirtualBox solution - which is fine
for a heavy user, but probably not for someone who just
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
>> > Well Sage is a bit different than this because you'd want the full set
>> > of tools for easy porting of SPKGs -- bash, tar, make, gcc, ...
>>
>> well, that's if you want to do Sage development, isn't it?
>> (I'd be surprised if Sag
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
>> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
>> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
>> even realising this. Cygwin works quietly
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 07:10 -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 11:02 pm, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > > > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > > > > In fact,
On Jan 8, 11:02 pm, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > > > In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> > > > (
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dimpase wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > > In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> > > (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes wi
On Jan 8, 10:40 pm, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:59, kcrisman wrote:
> >> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> >> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> >> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes
On Jan 8, 9:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> > In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> > (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
> > even realising this. Cygwin works quietly behind
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:59, kcrisman wrote:
>> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
>> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
>> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
>> even realising this. Cygwin works quietly be
> no, it doesn't give you *any* reasonable figures, at all!
> In fact, I am sure lots of people (a vast majority) are running Cygwin
> (or Mingw - a clone of Cygwin) apps on their Windows boxes without
> even realising this. Cygwin works quietly behind the scenes here.
>
That is very interesting.
On Friday 08 January 2010, YeChuan Xu wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>
> My system is Debian 5.0.3, and cpu is 64-bit.
> I can't find the precompiled version for debian.
> Does that for Ubuntu work for my case?
I'd say there is a good chance that the Ubuntu binary will work. If it doesn't
you'll have to
Hi, everyone,
My system is Debian 5.0.3, and cpu is 64-bit.
I can't find the precompiled version for debian.
Does that for Ubuntu work for my case?
Thanks!
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr..
On Jan 7, 3:24 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
[...]
> I'm more hopeful about the Sage Python classes--Python and Cython are
> both supported on Windows, and distutils is supposed to handle all the
> linking stuff. I'm not saying there won't be issues though--from what
> I've seen of it the path
Hack on opensuse 11.2: (4.3)
I simply had to copy the actual libreadline.so (and libreadline.a ?)
files from the distribution into the sage-local lib subdirectory and
replaced the libreadline.so.6 which caused the linker error.
After it the build was sussessful.
On 24 Dez. 2009, 22:39, james wr
24 matches
Mail list logo
