Wow...
On Nov 13, 4:22 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Nov 13, 4:04 pm, Jaasiel Ornelas wrote:
>
> > I'm not quite sure I understand the jsmath Part of sage. Am I supposed
> > to be able to see nice mathematical symbols and not just code?
>
> > i.e. not sqrt(x) but the actual symbol for the squ
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:56 PM, David wrote:
>
> For a given irreducible polynomial with integer coefficients, I would
> like to calculate a list of the first few thousand nontrivial zeros of
> the corresponding Dedekind zeta function. I would like to do this for
> lots of different polynomials
For a given irreducible polynomial with integer coefficients, I would
like to calculate a list of the first few thousand nontrivial zeros of
the corresponding Dedekind zeta function. I would like to do this for
lots of different polynomials.
In principle, it seems that this can be done with the
On Nov 13, 4:04 pm, Jaasiel Ornelas wrote:
> I'm not quite sure I understand the jsmath Part of sage. Am I supposed
> to be able to see nice mathematical symbols and not just code?
>
> i.e. not sqrt(x) but the actual symbol for the square root. Because if
> I am... I'm not. I was going through
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Harris
> wrote:
>> Sorry for the late reply
>>
>> Yes that is precisely what I had in mind. Check box or + - would be
>> great. From a personal point the right side sort of out of the way would be
>> good.
>
What about a triangle
I'm not quite sure I understand the jsmath Part of sage. Am I supposed
to be able to see nice mathematical symbols and not just code?
i.e. not sqrt(x) but the actual symbol for the square root. Because if
I am... I'm not. I was going through the jsmath menu, and I couldn't
find anything. It says
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Daniel Harris
wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply
>
> Yes that is precisely what I had in mind. Check box or + - would be
> great. From a personal point the right side sort of out of the way would be
> good.
Would you want it to hide *just* the input box, but le
Sorry for the late reply
Yes that is precisely what I had in mind. Check box or + - would be
great. From a personal point the right side sort of out of the way would be
good.
Dan
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Daniel Harris
> wrot
If there is any structure to your matrix that would let you pre-
simplify it a bit before taking the determinant it would probably help
a lot. Another possibility is to rename sines and cosines as
polynomial variables (i.e. let s1 = sin(x1), c1 = cos(x1), etc) and
have the entries belong to a Pol
On Nov 13, 9:26 am, Jean-Marc Schlenker wrote:
> Hello, I'm trying to do a slightly heavy computation under sage
> (symbolic computation of a 9x9 determinant with some polynomials in
> cos/sin as entries) but sage crashes with the message:
>
> "Maxima encountered a Lisp error:
> Memory limit re
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Jean-Marc Schlenker
wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm trying to do a slightly heavy computation under sage
> (symbolic computation of a 9x9 determinant with some polynomials in
> cos/sin as entries) but sage crashes with the message:
>
> "Maxima encountered a Lisp error:
Hello, I'm trying to do a slightly heavy computation under sage
(symbolic computation of a 9x9 determinant with some polynomials in
cos/sin as entries) but sage crashes with the message:
"Maxima encountered a Lisp error:
Memory limit reached. Please jump to an outer point or quit program."
I'm
Just looking at the stats package in Maxima. Not bad. Is there
anyway to take out parts of the calculations?
Thanx
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:05 AM, richard boardman
>
>> Dear Sirs,
>> I would like to run Sage on a computer without altering my hard drive.
>> I have loaded a live Ubuntu DVD and downloaded the Ubuntu tar file on
>> to a
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Mikie wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> Can one load just Maxima using a Python script? Something like
> import maxima
Are you asking about this *specifically* to make things faster
(because of startup time issue)?
William
>
> I sent you an e-mail. Your work with calcul
I think that you can program from Python, catch the output and so some
serach in the output.
Thus to integrate the function x*sin(2*x) let python runs the
command
maxima --batch-string="display2d:false$ print("ahoj",integrate(x*sin
(8*x),x),"ahoj")$"
The output should look like
Maxima 5.13.0 h
Robert,
Can one load just Maxima using a Python script? Something like
import maxima
I sent you an e-mail. Your work with calculaus is great.
My tutoring servers are getting better with time.
Thanx
On Nov 12, 3:32 pm, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 12 lis, 23:24, Erik Lane wrote:
>
> > Bot
17 matches
Mail list logo
