Dear Folks,
Pardon for the double-posting since I am unsure which list is more
appropriate.
In section 2.4.1 of the Sage Tutorial, there is a non-linear equation
example from Jason Grout that I tried out, but it failed. Details follow.
My version is built from the Ubuntu jaunty package source
2009/3/12 Thierry Dumont :
>
> I have problems runing sage in a chroot jail.
>
> Sage version: 3.3
>
> I followed what is written in http://www.sagemath.fr/doc/inst/node10.html
I don't have time to answer this but... it's vastly better these days
to use a virtual
machine (vmware, virtualbox, et
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>
>>> I've just discovered this wonderful thing called Sage (I am a completely
>>> newbie, my apol
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I've just discovered this wonderful thing called Sage (I am a completely
> newbie, my apologizes in advance...), and I have to admit that I am
> impressed with Sage!!!. I started yesterday, and came along the tutorial
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I've just discovered this wonderful thing called Sage (I am a completely
>> newbie, my apologizes in advance...), and I have to admit that I am
>> impressed
Robert Dodier wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2:54 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
>
>> Maxima 5.17posthttp://maxima.sourceforge.net
>> Using Lisp SBCL 1.0.18.debian
>> Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
>> Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
>> The function bug_report() pro
On Mar 12, 2:54 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Maxima 5.17posthttp://maxima.sourceforge.net
> Using Lisp SBCL 1.0.18.debian
> Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
> Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
> The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
>
John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 12, 11:38 am, mabshoff dortmund.de> wrote:
>> Never us cp to copy Sage unless you know what you are doing, but use
>> tar.
>
> Hm. I've never had any problems using cp; in fact I routinely do it
> before running 'sage -upgrade'. Does 'cp -pR' count as "knowing wh
On Mar 12, 11:38 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Never us cp to copy Sage unless you know what you are doing, but use
> tar.
Hm. I've never had any problems using cp; in fact I routinely do it
before running 'sage -upgrade'. Does 'cp -pR' count as "knowing what
I'm doing"?
John
--~--~-~--~-
it is true, I did it manually and the result should be 39.24
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I've just discovered this wonderful thing called Sage (I am a completely
>> newbie, my apologizes in advance...), and I have
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I've just discovered this wonderful thing called Sage (I am a completely
> newbie, my apologizes in advance...), and I have to admit that I am
> impressed with Sage!!!. I started yesterday, and came along the tutorial
>
On Mar 12, 1:54 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
> We should really upgrade.
The current version just has different bugs compared to what we
ship :)
But it seems that 5.18.x out in April ought to fix some annoying bugs
about asksign which crept into 5.17, so we should try again.
> --MIke
On Mar 12, 7:54 am, "koch.peerjoac...@googlemail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'm trying to build sage from the source on our cluster.
> The cluster is running under SLES9SP3 (all AMD Opterons).
> We are normaly using PGI compiler (8.0.X) for fortran. The
> installation is using gcc 4.2.1 from /us
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
> sage: g=9.81
> sage: t=var('t')
> sage: limit(2*g*(t^2-1)/(t-1),t=1)
> >>> gives me 39
>
> However, if I simplify the equation and calculate the limit...
> sage: limit(2*g*(t+1),t=1)
> >> gives me the good value 39.276
This is a pro
Dear colleagues,
I've just discovered this wonderful thing called Sage (I am a completely
newbie, my apologizes in advance...), and I have to admit that I am
impressed with Sage!!!. I started yesterday, and came along the tutorial
already. I still miss some more documentation...specially relat
On Mar 12, 7:17 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Dear all,
Hi,
> I had a great idea (so I thought) about upgrading in the background
> while the sage server is still running. Here is what I did, but it
> didn't work for some reason: In OS X 10.4, I shut down the server
> briefly, changed into the
On Mar 12, 10:18 am, kcrisman wrote:
> On Mar 12, 12:33 pm, kaufma wrote:
>
> > I am updating Sage on OSX 10.5. This is in a computer lab with about
> > 40 machines. There is an existing version of Sage on the machines.
> > Does the older version need to be uninstalled first?
It depends, you
On Mar 12, 12:33 pm, kaufma wrote:
> I am updating Sage on OSX 10.5. This is in a computer lab with about
> 40 machines. There is an existing version of Sage on the machines.
> Does the older version need to be uninstalled first?
Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Sage is self
I am updating Sage on OSX 10.5. This is in a computer lab with about
40 machines. There is an existing version of Sage on the machines.
Does the older version need to be uninstalled first?
Thanks,
Eric Kaufmann
Saitn Louis Univesity
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
Hi,
I'm trying to build sage from the source on our cluster.
The cluster is running under SLES9SP3 (all AMD Opterons).
We are normaly using PGI compiler (8.0.X) for fortran. The
installation is using gcc 4.2.1 from /usr/local/bin.
I tried to set F77, F90 and so on and also tried
to set sage_fortr
Dear all,
I had a great idea (so I thought) about upgrading in the background
while the sage server is still running. Here is what I did, but it
didn't work for some reason: In OS X 10.4, I shut down the server
briefly, changed into the sage directory, ran "cp -r * /newdirectory"
and restarted th
I have problems runing sage in a chroot jail.
Sage version: 3.3
I followed what is written in http://www.sagemath.fr/doc/inst/node10.html
After installing the chroot I copied all the sage tree from a former
installation, outside the chroot (may be the problem is here ?)
Everything thing in t
I can't get it to work. Could you be a bit more specific with the
details (I really have no clue).
The idea is that I upload the file to VMware Player and then load the
file in Sage, right??? Should I do the Data->Upload before I start
Sage? What would the exact syntax be if the Sage-file is i
Hi Robert,
On Mar 12, 8:42 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> > So, why is the corresponding operation not done in the second example?
>
> Because the ordering of variables is ambiguous. Should it be QQ
> [a,x,x1,y1,z] or QQ[a,x1,x,y1,z]?
Good point, thank you!
> sage: R = QQ['a,b,c,d']
> sage: S =
On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Dear Supporters,
>
> the following works:
> sage: R=PolynomialRing(QQ,['a','x1','y1'])
> sage: S=PolynomialRing(QQ,['x1','y1','z'])
> sage: R('x1+a')+S('x1+z')
> a + 2*x1 + z
>
> The following does not work:
> sage: R=PolynomialRing(QQ,['a','
Dear Supporters,
the following works:
sage: R=PolynomialRing(QQ,['a','x1','y1'])
sage: S=PolynomialRing(QQ,['x1','y1','z'])
sage: R('x1+a')+S('x1+z')
a + 2*x1 + z
The following does not work:
sage: R=PolynomialRing(QQ,['a','x','y1'])
sage: S=PolynomialRing(QQ,['x1','y1','z'])
sage: R('x+a
Hi William, Thanks for your reply!
Something has turned up that I must attend to, so I cannot try your
solution at the moment. But I'll get back to it shortly.
/hpon
On 11 Mar, 14:22, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:03 AM, hpon wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm running Sage from V
Hi!
On Mar 12, 4:48 am, Ajay Rawat wrote:
> sage: a=integrate(sin(t*t),t,0,3)
> sage: a
> sqrt(pi)*((sqrt(2)*I + sqrt(2))*erf((3*sqrt(2)*I + 3*sqrt(2))/2) +
> (sqrt(2)*I - sqrt(2))*erf((3*sqrt(2)*I - 3*sqrt(2))/2))/8
Yes, and then
sage: a.n()
yields a Traceback,
TypeError: unable to simplify
28 matches
Mail list logo