On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:05 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Dear Support,
>
> I don't believe that turning a notebook worksheet into a pdf is
Though it's not perfect, what I do is click the Print button in the
notebook, just to the left of "Worksheet", then do "print to pdf",
which is an option in most
Dear Support,
I don't believe that turning a notebook worksheet into a pdf is
implemented (and thanks to Dan D. for SageTeX, which unfortunately I
haven't been able to use properly yet, and Rob B. for his interesting
experiments the other way). And that's fine, though it would be great
long-term
Tnx! I learned useful stuff ...
On 31 jan, 20:52, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:26 AM, mabshoff
> > wrote:
>
> >> On Jan 31, 11:17 am, William Stein wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Rolandb wrote:
>
It looks like the reference manual needs to be updated. And you
pointing this out makes me rethink whether we should set some defaults
to make it easier to get the list out. But on the current version, to
get the list that you want you need to actually pull it from a
GraphQuery. The code looks
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:56 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> I'm having some issues with integer matrices. I have a matrix mat:
>
> sage: mat
> 891 x 1559 sparse matrix over Integer Ring
> sage: mat.rank() # this takes a long time
> sage.bin(75404,0xa06be720) malloc: *** mmap(size=447524864) fa
On Jan 31, 11:56 am, John H Palmieri wrote:
> I'm having some issues with integer matrices. I have a matrix mat:
>
> sage: mat
> 891 x 1559 sparse matrix over Integer Ring
> sage: mat.rank() # this takes a long time
> sage.bin(75404,0xa06be720) malloc: *** mmap(size=447524864) failed
> (error
I'm having some issues with integer matrices. I have a matrix mat:
sage: mat
891 x 1559 sparse matrix over Integer Ring
sage: mat.rank() # this takes a long time
sage.bin(75404,0xa06be720) malloc: *** mmap(size=447524864) failed
(error code=12)
*** error: can't allocate region
*** set a breakpo
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:26 AM, mabshoff
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 31, 11:17 am, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Rolandb wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>>
>>> > I received first a MemoryError, and later on Sage repor
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:26 AM, mabshoff
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 31, 11:17 am, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Rolandb wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > I received first a MemoryError, and later on Sage reported:
>>
>> That means that Sage ran out of memory. It's not a bug -
On Jan 31, 11:17 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Rolandb wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I received first a MemoryError, and later on Sage reported:
>
> That means that Sage ran out of memory. It's not a bug -- it's just a
> limitation of your computer.
srange() builds a
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Rolandb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I received first a MemoryError, and later on Sage reported:
That means that Sage ran out of memory. It's not a bug -- it's just a
limitation of your computer.
> /usr/local/sage/local/bin/sage-sage: line 358: 10172
> Killed
> python "
Hi,
I received first a MemoryError, and later on Sage reported:
/usr/local/sage/local/bin/sage-sage: line 358: 10172
Killed
python "$@"
{{{id=59|
uitkomst1=[]
uitkomst2=[]
eind=int((10^9+2)/(2*sqrt(3)))
print eind
for y in srange(1,eind):
test1=is_square(3*y^2+1,True)
test2=is_square(48*y^2+1,
David, William,
yes, by increasing plot_points it goes as it should. Thanks, and I
should have thought of it!
I second the idea of increaisng the default plot-points, at least to
100. On my not so recent intel duo it took less than a second with
200.
Thanks,
P
--~--~-~--~~
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:24 AM, littlemathteacher
wrote:
>
> OK. Let me try to be precise. The information I gave in my post was
> not correct.
> I have installed
>
> sage-3.2.2-ubuntu32bit-intel-i686-Linux
>
> and I receive the error message "... ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION ... pni" but
> however this
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:08 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> I don't know anything about your economics problem but when I typed
>
> cp=contour_plot(utility,(x,0,24),(y,
> 0,24),fill=False,cmap='cool',contours=(100,1000,2048,2700,3500),plot_points=200)
>
> instead, I definitely got a different plot.
I don't know anything about your economics problem but when I typed
cp=contour_plot(utility,(x,0,24),(y,
0,24),fill=False,cmap='cool',contours=(100,1000,2048,2700,3500),plot_points=200)
instead, I definitely got a different plot. Can you try that (or even
with a higher value)
and see if it is co
Hi everyone,
I run into a very strange problem, that looks like critical to me.
Basically, I plot two functions that I know must be tangent at a given
point, and they are not.
First, the code:
x,y=var('x,y')
utility=y*x^2
budget = 24-x
cp=contour_plot(utility,(x,0,24),(y,
0,24),fill=False,cmap=
OK. Let me try to be precise. The information I gave in my post was
not correct.
I have installed
sage-3.2.2-ubuntu32bit-intel-i686-Linux
and I receive the error message "... ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION ... pni" but
however this version seems to be running well.
In order to try the next version I have
Well I tried
v = iter(Permutations(range(n)))
and the code compiled fine - but still ran slow. To test the Petersen
graph (10 vertices), the compiled code took a wall time of 524.23 s,
and the uncompiled code, using
v=(p for p in Permutations(range(n)))
took a wall time of 492.22 s. The CPU
19 matches
Mail list logo
