I don't know if there is anything Sage specific. However, Sage contains
matplotlib, which apparently can do such things. For example, I googled
maps matplotlib and got this:
http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/Matplotlib/Maps
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Sage wrote:
>
> Is Sage suitable for topog
On Jan 29, 5:32 pm, Sage wrote:
> Is Sage suitable for topography? I have collected the data of a see,
> discreate data points. I need to make regressions on the data. Then, I
> think the contour plot creates the final topographic map. Or am I
> wrong? How are topographic maps dene in Sage? Can I
Is Sage suitable for topography? I have collected the data of a see,
discreate data points. I need to make regressions on the data. Then, I
think the contour plot creates the final topographic map. Or am I
wrong? How are topographic maps dene in Sage? Can I give the data as
an input and get the ma
Small example:http://sagenb.org/home/pub/195
I would like to have it decompose into something like:
z = ( 0.027027027027e ) / d + 3p/dmq
f'(x) = ( 4 * z ^ 2 ) - ( 2 * z )
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To
I'm trying to do some symbolic calculus and am having trouble with the special function spherical_bessel_J(). I can't get it to work when the argument contains two factors.
Here is a simple program:
k=var('k');
k=maxima(k);
rho=var('rho');
rho=maxima(rho);
arg=var('arg');
arg=maxima(arg);
arg=k*r
I have a really large formula that obviously has some common terms and
significant duplication inside of it, is there a way to make sage
reduce, or extract out common pieces?
Small example: http://sagenb.org:8000/home/pub/195
Any help is greatly appreciated.
-Zac
--~--~-~--~~--
On Jan 27, 2:54 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Arun wrote:
>
> > On Jan 27, 3:14 am, William Stein wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Arun wrote:
>
> >> > When I try to run Sage 3.2.3 on Pentium M 750 (Dothan, MMX, SSE, SSE2)
> >> > with VMWare on Window
Hi,
suppose I have a field embedding A = GF(2^4) -> B = GF(2^20) say,
and I pick a homomorphism phi from C=A.Hom(GF(2^20,'x')), e.g.
sage: phi
Ring morphism:
From: Finite Field in x of size 2^4
To: Finite Field in x of size 2^20
Defn: x |--> x^19 + x^14 + x^13 + x^12 + x^10
On Jan 29, 1:09 pm, david wrote:
> I have Red Hat
> distribution of Linux.
Could you please specify the red hat version you have and your cpu
type?
Probably the fedora binary could work for you but I don't know.
harald
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gro
>
> Could you please paste the following lines into a Sage session and
> tell me their output?
>
sage: sage.misc.viewer.viewer()
'firefox'
sage: sage.misc.viewer.BROWSER
'firefox'
sage: sage.misc.viewer.PNG_VIEWER
'firefox'
sage: sage.misc.viewer.DVI_VIEWER
'xdvi'
sage: sage.misc.viewer.PDF_VIEWE
Dear support team,
I would like to install sage on my Machine. I have Red Hat
distribution of Linux.
Can I get a compiled package? or do I have to build the source myself?
Thanks!
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@goog
> This is caused by the scoping rules for Python's lambdas and list
> comprehensions. See the question and answer here for an
> explanation:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/139819/why-results-of-map-and-list...
>
> --Mike
...ok, so, a way to write it would be
b = [lambda x,u=i:u for i in ran
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:56 PM, martin Campos Pinto
wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> in my Notebook (version 3.2.3) I get the following:
>
> sage: a = float(1>1)
> sage: a
>
> 0.0
>
> sage: var('x')
> sage: b(x) = float(x>1)
When you make a definition like this, float is immediately applie
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:46 AM, martin Campos Pinto
wrote:
> I get 0 (which is fine), now when I type
>
> b = [lambda x:i for i in range(2)]
> b[0](0)
>
> I get 1 ... There must be a simple explanation for this but I can't
> figure it out. What's wrong ?
This is caused by the scoping ru
Hi everybody,
in my Notebook (version 3.2.3) I get the following:
sage: a = float(1>1)
sage: a
0.0
sage: var('x')
sage: b(x) = float(x>1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/Users/campos/.sage/sage_notebook/worksheets/admin/4/code/
204.py", line 8, in
_=var
Hi again,
... and again sorry if this is a newbie's question:
so when I type (in my sage Notebook 3.2.3)
a = [i for i in range(2)]
a[0]
I get 0 (which is fine), now when I type
b = [lambda x:i for i in range(2)]
b[0](0)
I get 1 ... There must be a simple explanation for this but I can't
figur
16 matches
Mail list logo