[sage-support] jsmath directory confusion.

2008-11-26 Thread Gary Church
Hello all, I've noticed that sage has two separate, but somewhat unequal, jsmath subdirectories. One is rooted at: sage/data/extcode/javascript/ The other is at: sage/data/extcode/notebook/javascript/ Why two jsmath directories and if I want to upgrade the jsmath used in sage, where do I in

[sage-support] Re: parametric_plot3d with texture

2008-11-26 Thread Marshall Hampton
I don't think so but I could be wrong. It should be possible using Tachyon, but I've had trouble using my own textures with tachyon in sage. The tachyon interface needs a little love; at the moment that is down towards the bottom of my to-do list but I hope to get to it somewhat soon. -M. Hampt

[sage-support] parametric_plot3d with texture

2008-11-26 Thread Dorian Raymer
Hi, Is there a way to render 3d-parametric plots with a texture (from an image/bitmap file)? Thanks, -Dorian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[sage-support] Re: using the solutions of an equation

2008-11-26 Thread Eli
Thanks to Robert Bradshaw and Jason Grout ! the problem is solved. Eli On Nov 26, 3:28 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > > > > Eli wrote: > >> Hello, > >> In the sage tutorial, I found how to solve equations: > > >> sage: x, b,

[sage-support] Re: QQbar bug

2008-11-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 26, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Simon King wrote: > > Dear Michael, > > On Nov 26, 11:34 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > dortmund.de> wrote: >> please open a ticket. I would guess as you did that those two >> related. > > Done, it is # 4621. > > By the way, the above problem appears even more d

[sage-support] Re: using the solutions of an equation

2008-11-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > Eli wrote: >> Hello, >> In the sage tutorial, I found how to solve equations: >> >> sage: x, b, c = var('x b c') >> sage: solve([x^2 + b*x + c == 0],x) >> [x == (-sqrt(b^2 - 4*c) - b)/2, x == (sqrt(b^2 - 4*c) - b)/2] >> >> However, I could not fi

[sage-support] Re: Open Source webMathematica?

2008-11-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 26, 2008, at 9:10 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > heebie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks a lot for your help. I just have a few questions, if you >> wouldn't mind. >> >> 1) Can I just send the http requests to sagenb.org, or will I have to >> host the notebook myself? > > I don't know; I haven't used

[sage-support] Re: sage notebook %latex cells fail to work properly; please help.

2008-11-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26 Lis, 01:26, Gary Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > %latex > $\iiint_E y e^{-xy}\;dV$ works fine on sagenb.com > > > sh: line 1:  6005 Trace/BPT trap          

[sage-support] Re: using the solutions of an equation

2008-11-26 Thread Jason Grout
Eli wrote: > Hello, > In the sage tutorial, I found how to solve equations: > > sage: x, b, c = var('x b c') > sage: solve([x^2 + b*x + c == 0],x) > [x == (-sqrt(b^2 - 4*c) - b)/2, x == (sqrt(b^2 - 4*c) - b)/2] > > However, I could not find how to assign the solution to some variable. > That is,

[sage-support] using the solutions of an equation

2008-11-26 Thread Eli
Hello, In the sage tutorial, I found how to solve equations: sage: x, b, c = var('x b c') sage: solve([x^2 + b*x + c == 0],x) [x == (-sqrt(b^2 - 4*c) - b)/2, x == (sqrt(b^2 - 4*c) - b)/2] However, I could not find how to assign the solution to some variable. That is, something that will do: assi

[sage-support] Re: Open Source webMathematica?

2008-11-26 Thread Jason Grout
heebie wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for your help. I just have a few questions, if you > wouldn't mind. > > 1) Can I just send the http requests to sagenb.org, or will I have to > host the notebook myself? I don't know; I haven't used that http protocol myself. You could try it, though. >

[sage-support] Re: variety() bug?

2008-11-26 Thread Simon King
Dear Michael, On Nov 26, 12:03 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > > Shall one open a ticket then? > > Yes, please do. And please make sure to ping either singular-team or > Hans directly. I know Singular 3-1 is coming, so maybe we are lucky > and it is either fixed there or wil

[sage-support] Re: Open Source webMathematica?

2008-11-26 Thread heebie
Hi, Thanks a lot for your help. I just have a few questions, if you wouldn't mind. 1) Can I just send the http requests to sagenb.org, or will I have to host the notebook myself? 2) What exactly are the security implications, and are they for the site hosting the notebook or the site sending the

[sage-support] Re: problem with installing packages

2008-11-26 Thread Marshall Hampton
I installed sage-3.2 from source on an Ubuntu machine, and when I do $./sage -optional I get the error below. I can download directly (using a browser for example) and install the downloaded packages. This is on my home network where I have never had a problem using macs. Changing the SAGE_SER

[sage-support] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A simple interval challenge]

2008-11-26 Thread Paul Zimmermann
Hi, a committee is currently being formed to propose a standard for interval arithmetic. This standard will be IEEE P1788, as IEEE P754 for floating-point computations. Current discussions are on the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailing list. It is possible to join that list for people interested,

[sage-support] Re: QQbar bug

2008-11-26 Thread Simon King
Dear Michael, On Nov 26, 11:34 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > please open a ticket. I would guess as you did that those two related. Done, it is # 4621. By the way, the above problem appears even more directly: sage: F.= NumberField(x^2-2) sage: 2 in QQbar True sage:

[sage-support] Re: variety() bug?

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 3:00 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Michael, > > On Nov 26, 7:22 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: > > Is this reproducible for you every time? > > For me, it is reproducible. > triangLfak is the function that was called by Sage. All previous

[sage-support] Re: variety() bug?

2008-11-26 Thread Simon King
Dear Michael, On Nov 26, 7:22 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > Is this reproducible for you every time? For me, it is reproducible. > It might be an issue inside Singular, a pexpect synchronization issue or just > a plain old bug in > Sage. Looking at the error message,

[sage-support] Re: QQbar bug

2008-11-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 26, 2008, at 2:30 AM, Simon King wrote: > Hi! > > On Nov 26, 1:51 am, Alex Raichev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sage: F.= NumberField(x^2-2) >> sage: a^2 >> 2 >> sage: a^2 in QQ >> True >> sage: a^2 in QQbar >> False >> sage: 2 in QQbar >> True > > A related observation: > sage: F.=Numbe

[sage-support] Re: QQbar bug

2008-11-26 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 26, 2:30 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Nov 26, 1:51 am, Alex Raichev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > sage: F.= NumberField(x^2-2) > > sage: a^2 > > 2 > > sage: a^2 in QQ > > True > > sage: a^2 in QQbar > > False > > sage: 2 in QQbar > > True > > A related observa

[sage-support] Re: QQbar bug

2008-11-26 Thread Simon King
Hi! On Nov 26, 1:51 am, Alex Raichev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sage: F.= NumberField(x^2-2) > sage: a^2 > 2 > sage: a^2 in QQ > True > sage: a^2 in QQbar > False > sage: 2 in QQbar > True A related observation: sage: F.=NumberField(x^2-2) sage: QQ.is_subring(F) True sage: F.is_subring(QQb