On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> I only know a tiny bit about symbolic integration, but mabshoff's
> statement that it will be a long path is certainly an understatement.
> What I would like to see happen soon is some of the basic cases
> solved in our own code, and then pa
On Nov 22, 11:34 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> I only know a tiny bit about symbolic integration, but mabshoff's
> statement that it will be a long path is certainly an understatement.
> What I would like to see happen so
On Nov 22, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:00 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>> It is my understand that it cannot compete with MMA or Maple there
>> and
>> various people have claimed that Maxima's integration code is better
>> than the code in Axiom. I do not know if that
On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:00 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> It is my understand that it cannot compete with MMA or Maple there and
> various people have claimed that Maxima's integration code is better
> than the code in Axiom. I do not know if that is true. Anyway, in the
> next Maxima release there will b
On Nov 22, 10:56 pm, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
> It's my understanding that Axiom is best in breed for integration, so
> it may be best to use that.
It is my understand that it cannot compete with MMA or Maple there and
various p
On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:41 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Ginac (on which Pynac is based) doesn't have any nontrivial symbolic
> integration. So that's going to continue to depend on Maxima until
> we:
>
>* write our own
>* switch to using sympy for integration (sympy does some
> integra
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:01 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As a fellow Maple user, I highly recommend that you look at the new
>>> symbolics
On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:01 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> As a fellow Maple user, I highly recommend that you look at the new
>> symbolics in Sage, pynac. While support is still incomplete, it has
>> capabilities more si
On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:15 AM, Thomas Madden wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Here is a link to the discussion
>
> http://www.mapleprimes.com/forum/cpu-use
>
> I am a teacher and I used Maple quite a bit to make tests and
> handouts. It seemed to only happen in document mode where I was using
> pretty much just
William Stein wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> A while ago, I was running Sage on a ibook G4 with 10.3.x (but then
>> upgraded to 10.4 when it came out). I don't remember any problems with
>> Sage (other than long compilation times).
>
> I think that's not possible because I believe Sage has ne
On Nov 22, 9:34 pm, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Thomas Madden wrote:
>
> > I will have to if I ever want to get any sleep again. But only
> > temporarily because I am having too much fun with it!
>
> > Michael,
>
> > I think I became aware of Sage about t
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Thomas Madden wrote:
>
>> I will have to if I ever want to get any sleep again. But only
>> temporarily because I am having too much fun with it!
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> I think I became aware of S
On Nov 22, 9:50 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Madden wrote:
Hi,
> > I think I became aware of Sage about two years ago. At that time I was
> > using Maple and was content but the idea behind Sage really interested
> > me so I would periodically check up on it. Almost a ye
Thomas Madden wrote:
>
>
> I think I became aware of Sage about two years ago. At that time I was
> using Maple and was content but the idea behind Sage really interested
> me so I would periodically check up on it. Almost a year ago I noticed
> that my %CPU use was maxing out when I was working
On Nov 23, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Thomas Madden wrote:
> I will have to if I ever want to get any sleep again. But only
> temporarily because I am having too much fun with it!
>
> Michael,
>
> I think I became aware of Sage about two years ago. At that time I was
> using Maple and was content but the
On Nov 22, 8:16 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Nov 22, 8:14 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Madden
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 22, 5:59 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Nov 22, 8:14 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Madden
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 22, 5:59 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Madden
>
> > [snip]
>
> > William an
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Madden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 22, 5:59 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Madden
>>
>
> [snip]
>
> William and David,
>
> Thanks very much for the quick responses. I have been keeping
>
On Nov 22, 5:59 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Madden
>
[snip]
William and David,
Thanks very much for the quick responses. I have been keeping
an eye on Sage for about a year or so now but was unable to use it
due to hardware and OS co
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Madden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the simple question, but I don't know if I am quitting sage
> properly or even if it matters. I am new to open source and have
> little experience using Terminal. I am using OS X 10.5.5 and Safari
> 3.2. If I s
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Madden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the simple question, but I don't know if I am quitting sage
> properly or even if it matters. I am new to open source and have
> little experience using Terminal. I am using OS X 10.5.5 and Safari
> 3.2. If I s
Sorry for the simple question, but I don't know if I am quitting sage
properly or even if it matters. I am new to open source and have
little experience using Terminal. I am using OS X 10.5.5 and Safari
3.2. If I start Sage as suggested in the tutorial and then type quit
as suggested on page 47 (p
datajerk wrote:
> Is there away to adjust the Typeset fontsize? It's a bit small with
> Firefox and OS/X. Clearly I can increase all the fonts, but would
> prefer to only change the Typeset output font size. The size used by
> jsmath is about right.
The Typeset checkbox just uses the normal js
Is there away to adjust the Typeset fontsize? It's a bit small with
Firefox and OS/X. Clearly I can increase all the fonts, but would
prefer to only change the Typeset output font size. The size used by
jsmath is about right.
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To po
I need to draw a plot in the spherical coordinate system, but I
haven't found any examples in tutorial or reference manual. So, is
there any way to do it in sage? And how to make grid in such kind of
plots?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
Hi all!
Does anyone know any cool extensions for firefox? I know only
ItIsAllText...
For example i'd like to have syntax highlighting? (into the firefox
text areas)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
26 matches
Mail list logo
