The transformation=True fails even for matrix(QQ,[[0,1,0],[0,0,0],
[0,0,0]]). It looks like the algorithm to construct it is flawed, and
will not work if there are blocks with the same eigenvalue. Anyone
want to re-write this?
-M. Hampton
On Oct 12, 9:34 pm, Rob Beezer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I have a 6x6 matrix with integer entries, whose eigenvalues are also
integers. I wanted the Jordan canonical form, and the associated
matrix to make the similarity transformation. The Jordan form comes
out nicely, but I can't get the transformation matrix. I've included
the error output below -
Does anyone know how to use the REDUCE algebra package in SAGE? is it
even possible yet?
Thanks,
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For mo
On Oct 11, 2:50 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an easy way to make an animation of an @interact as a slider
> goes through its values?
hello, i did this animation by hand to have exact alignments of the
axes, the sliders and a compressed gif and so on. But you can try the
Can someone please tell me why it is impossible to solve the following
system of boolean equations in SAGE:
sage: N=144
sage: P = BooleanPolynomialRing(N,'x',order='lex')
sage: t = []
sage: for i in range(0,N):
t.append(var(P.gen(i)))
sage: print "t",t
t [x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8,
Andrey,
I'm sending this to sage-support.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> I have problems using Maple 11 from Sage - it does something, but something is
> broken in the interface. Is it easy to fix and if yes, how? Below is a sa
