Byungchul Cha wrote:
>
> Thanks for all of your help. I did
>
> 1. Importing sin and cos using "from math import sin, cos"
> 2. Removing pi and sqrt out of the loops, following Jason's
> suggestion:
> twopi = 2*n(pi); mystep = twopi/n(sqrt(number_of_points))
>
By the way, RR(pi) is faster tha
Thanks for all of your help. I did
1. Importing sin and cos using "from math import sin, cos"
2. Removing pi and sqrt out of the loops, following Jason's
suggestion:
twopi = 2*n(pi); mystep = twopi/n(sqrt(number_of_points))
and I got CPU time: 0.21 s, Wall time: 0.25 s. This looks much
reasona
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 at 08:23AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> Related question: Where is the 'best' place to put the sagetex
> folder? I have tried a lot of variations on the various texmf folders
> (I seem to have an abundance of them, including a texmf-dist which is
> where my latex looks for things.
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 9, 1:20 pm, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hii Maike,
>
>> I tried using the sage server at sagenb.org. Generally, it's great,
>> but sometimes it's just incredibly slow. I'm having to wait about a
>> minute for cells to be executed or worksheets to
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 8, 5:48 am, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Ironically pretty much everything works under Solaris now but the
>>> notebook. I think that issue is easy to fix (RAND_MAX related
>> incidentally, is it possible to get knoboo to work on solaris instead
>> of the no
Byungchul Cha wrote:
>
> I am using sage for my calc III students. The following short code
> produces about 500 points on a sphere.
>
> pts=[]; number_of_points=500
> for t1 in srange(0, pi, n(pi/sqrt(number_of_points))):
> for t2 in srange(0, 2*pi, n(2*pi/sqrt(number_of_points))):
> pts.
On Oct 8, 5:48 am, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ironically pretty much everything works under Solaris now but the
> > notebook. I think that issue is easy to fix (RAND_MAX related
>
> incidentally, is it possible to get knoboo to work on solaris instead
> of the notebook ?
>
> (sorry if
On Oct 9, 1:20 pm, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
Hii Maike,
> I tried using the sage server at sagenb.org. Generally, it's great,
> but sometimes it's just incredibly slow. I'm having to wait about a
> minute for cells to be executed or worksheets to be loaded or saved
> sometimes.
Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I think the culprit is the "pi" in the srange, which gets Maxima too
> involved (and maxima as called through sage is slow). This may
> improve very soon as there is some work being done to shift basic
> symbolic things like "pi" to a more python-based backend.
>
> Anyw
I think the culprit is the "pi" in the srange, which gets Maxima too
involved (and maxima as called through sage is slow). This may
improve very soon as there is some work being done to shift basic
symbolic things like "pi" to a more python-based backend.
Anyway for the moment you can avoid this
Hello,
I tried using the sage server at sagenb.org. Generally, it's great,
but sometimes it's just incredibly slow. I'm having to wait about a
minute for cells to be executed or worksheets to be loaded or saved
sometimes.
Is everyone having these problems or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks f
I am using sage for my calc III students. The following short code
produces about 500 points on a sphere.
pts=[]; number_of_points=500
for t1 in srange(0, pi, n(pi/sqrt(number_of_points))):
for t2 in srange(0, 2*pi, n(2*pi/sqrt(number_of_points))):
pts.append((sin(t1)*cos(t2), sin(t1)*sin(
I use xcode (OS X) and emacs. Both can be configured to
recognize .pyx files as Python files, and if you can configure your
Eclipse plugin to do the same that would probably be ideal for you
(or, even better, modify the plugin to recognize cdef methods, etc.)
On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:04 PM, ce
Does anyone know of a way in Sage to export the output of a %html cell
to a pdf or dvi file?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, v
Aren't I embarassed. It's the FIRST LINE of the help screen.
regards
john perry
On Oct 9, 12:27 pm, john_perry_usm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a small library of SAGE functions. I've saved it as
> somefile.py. I can import it and run it in SAGE using
>
> >>> import somefile.py
>
On Thursday 09 October 2008, john_perry_usm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a small library of SAGE functions. I've saved it as
> somefile.py. I can import it and run it in SAGE using
>
> >>> import somefile.py
> >>> somefile.read_blah()
>
> However, this works only as long as somefile.py uses only Python
Hi,
I have a small library of SAGE functions. I've saved it as
somefile.py. I can import it and run it in SAGE using
>>> import somefile.py
>>> somefile.read_blah()
However, this works only as long as somefile.py uses only Python
commands & structures. If I try to define a PolynomialRing, it
com
I'm using /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/sage
/usr/share/texmf is the latex root on openSuSE
On 9 Ott, 17:23, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Related question: Where is the 'best' place to put the sagetex
> folder? I have tried a lot of variations on the various texmf folders
> (I seem to ha
Related question: Where is the 'best' place to put the sagetex
folder? I have tried a lot of variations on the various texmf folders
(I seem to have an abundance of them, including a texmf-dist which is
where my latex looks for things. It only seems to be looking in latex/
base/, though.
- kcr
Pierre wrote:
> the gedit editor, shipped with ubuntu and most gnome-based systems, is
> much underrated, it is in fact a very good choice. It is highly
> configurable, comparable to emacs i dare say, and you use python
> instead of lisp to configure it ! for example i have easily added to
> gedit
Hi !
How can I save worksheet on .pdf ?
Regards, Ines.
On 9 oct, 13:24, Ines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I install gcc-4.2.4 in /usr/local
> then I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /usr/local/lib by :
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> And SAGE works !
This may be a silly question, but integer linear programming seems to
be about maximizing some quantity relative to constraints given by a
matrix equality (or inequality), where everything is happening over
the integers. How does this relate to finding integer solutions to a
matrix
the gedit editor, shipped with ubuntu and most gnome-based systems, is
much underrated, it is in fact a very good choice. It is highly
configurable, comparable to emacs i dare say, and you use python
instead of lisp to configure it ! for example i have easily added to
gedit a couple of tools to lo
I install gcc-4.2.4 in /usr/local
then I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /usr/local/lib by :
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
And SAGE works !
Thank you very much,
Ines.
On 8 oct, 21:43, "Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Le Tue
wiso wrote:
> I've some problem using sagetex with LaTeX. If I try:
>
> pdflatex prova.tex
> sage prova.sage
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "prova.py", line 3, in
> import sagetex
> ImportError: No module named sagetex
>
>
> now I'm working in my directory, but if copy /u
I've some problem using sagetex with LaTeX. If I try:
pdflatex prova.tex
sage prova.sage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "prova.py", line 3, in
import sagetex
ImportError: No module named sagetex
now I'm working in my directory, but if copy /usr/share/texmf/tex/
latex/sage/saget
Dear John,
On Oct 8, 10:01 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> This may be a silly question, but integer linear programming seems to
> be about maximizing some quantity relative to constraints given by a
> matrix equality (or inequality), where everything is happening over
> the
27 matches
Mail list logo
