On Jul 5, 8:39 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2008, at 7:16 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> would be good enough? (That is, assuming I've defined a reasonable
> >>> __eq__ method for the parents, the SteenrodAlgebra class.)
>
> >> Yes, though that will mea
On Jul 5, 2008, at 7:16 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> would be good enough? (That is, assuming I've defined a reasonable
>>> __eq__ method for the parents, the SteenrodAlgebra class.)
>>
>> Yes, though that will mean something like A5.P(2) - A5.P(2) == 0 will
>> return False. This is why you
On Jul 5, 5:48 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:42 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Ah, it looks like your __eq__ method is assuming that self and
> other
> are elements of the steenrod algebra. There are two solutions to
> this:
I don't know if this problem is common one:
I was working in vista. It logged in into sage via the sage website.
I had two 3d graphs of a sphere.
Then java correctly showed me the one I was looking.
But the second jmol appeared black. And it said: "script
terminated".
Any ideas?
Has the i
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:42 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
Ah, it looks like your __eq__ method is assuming that self and
other
are elements of the steenrod algebra. There are two solutions to
this:
>>
1) Use __cmp__ which (in Sage) will ensure that self and other have
>
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:50 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Jul 5, 10:08 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Jul 4, 2008, at 1:52 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I still don't understand two things: why the gen method is being
>>> used,
>>> and why if I multiply an element
On Jul 5, 10:08 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2008, at 1:52 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 10:53 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On Jul 4, 2008, at 10:44 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > So I'm very confused. Any ideas
On Jul 5, 10:08 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2008, at 1:52 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 10:53 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On Jul 4, 2008, at 10:44 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > So I'm very confused. Any ideas
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, iSAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just installed the ubuntu package libfreetype6-dev, and verified
> that it has put several header files in /usr/include/freetype2/
> freetype
> But I still get the compilation errors.
> In my sage installation in the directory
On Jul 4, 2008, at 1:52 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jul 4, 10:53 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Jul 4, 2008, at 10:44 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> So I'm very confused. Any ideas what I should look at to try
> to fix
> this?
>>
Yes, there will definitely be code to do this. I've got a lot of
ideas but haven't gotten around to it because most of my sage
development efforts been spent on coercion.
- Robert
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:16 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My question is: is there / will there be som
mabshoff a écrit :
>
>
> Nope, I think Harald misunderstood you. The goal is to specify say
> some finite element and then have logic to produce C or Fortran code
> that can be dumped to file and then copy and pasted into someones C or
> Fortran code without the need to depend on Sage. I have seen
On Jul 5, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Daryl Hammond wrote:
> Finally I spent several hours trying to reduce the SAGE code down to
> the
> smallest number of lines that would still present the problem. I
> believe I've
> done that with the following:
>
> cat /home/daryl/UserData/sage/add.sage
> # 2008-07-
I just installed the ubuntu package libfreetype6-dev, and verified
that it has put several header files in /usr/include/freetype2/
freetype
But I still get the compilation errors.
In my sage installation in the directory
/usr/local/sage-3.0.2-ubuntu32-intel-i686-Linux/local/include/
freetype2/free
On Jul 5, 3:02 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 9:16 am, Thierry Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > My question is: is there / will there be some tool for code generation
> > in Sage ?
It has been discussed of doing something like that recently at S
On Jul 5, 3:54 am, iSAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Sorry, a little correction:
> I issued the command sage -i graphviz-2.16.1.p0 which gave errors, but
> nauty could be installed without trouble.
Yep, I would only install one spkg at a time.
> On Jul 5, 11:33 am, iSAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sorry, a little correction:
I issued the command sage -i graphviz-2.16.1.p0 which gave errors, but
nauty could be installed without trouble.
On Jul 5, 11:33 am, iSAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get the following errors while trying to install graphviz.
> I am using ubuntu 8.04 and sage-3.0.2
On Jul 5, 9:16 am, Thierry Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My question is: is there / will there be some tool for code generation
> in Sage ?
Hi, I understand what you want to do, but as far as I understand, this
is only needed, because of the performance? There are already tool
I get the following errors while trying to install graphviz.
I am using ubuntu 8.04 and sage-3.0.2-ubuntu32-intel-i686-Linux
I issued the command sage -i nauty-24b7 -i graphviz-2.16.1.p0
This is the first time I have tried to install any package, so I am
unsure if I am doing anything wrong, but n
David, I re-installed sage-3.0.2 from source and then ran your test
against
sage-3.0.1 and sage-3.0.2. The run times were comparable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage]$ /home/daryl/sage-3.0.1/sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.0.1, Release Date: 20
Hello,
My question is: is there / will there be some tool for code generation
in Sage ?
Many people involved (like me) in "scientific computing" (implementation
of numerical methods) use computer algebra tools for the generation of C
(or Fortran, or matlab, or...) code.
For example, if you
21 matches
Mail list logo
