[sage-support] Re: ABI Selection Error for GMP in Sage3.0.3 on x86_64 System

2008-06-28 Thread JohnBussoletti
I managed to get a successful build of sage-3.0.3 on a 64 bit Xeon Linux system. The problem is the the gmp-4.2.2 included in the sage distribution is either a mix of earlier releases (gmp-4.2.1) or is an eaerlier release (gmp-4.2.1). Replacing the gmp-4.2.2.spkg file with an spkg file built wi

[sage-support] Re: group rings question

2008-06-28 Thread David Joyner
If you attach a file containing ## def PermutationGroupRing(R,G): return PermutationGroupRing_generic(R,G) class PermutationGroupRing_generic(CombinatorialAlgebra): def __init__(self, R, G): self.group = G s

[sage-support] Re: group rings question

2008-06-28 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 28, 2008, at 9:33 AM, David Joyner wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM, John Cremona >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> It seems that what Dan Bump's instructions did not specify is what >>> propert

[sage-support] Re: group rings question

2008-06-28 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jun 28, 2008, at 9:33 AM, David Joyner wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM, John Cremona > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It seems that what Dan Bump's instructions did not specify is what >> properties the class assigned to ._combinatorial_class must have. >> And it needs something

[sage-support] Re: error in const.pdf (sage constructions manual)

2008-06-28 Thread David Joyner
Thanks for the report. There are so many problems with the constructions document, the plan is to replace it by a Cookbook, containing many chapters, each authored by a developer with interest in that topic. On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Georg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On page 3: > There

[sage-support] Re: group rings question

2008-06-28 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:00 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems that what Dan Bump's instructions did not specify is what > properties the class assigned to ._combinatorial_class must have. > And it needs something which PermutationGroupElement does not have. > > Does that h

[sage-support] error in const.pdf (sage constructions manual)

2008-06-28 Thread Georg
On page 3: There is the following line: If you type view(f.diff('x')) another window ... f.diff('x') does not work, it works if f is of type like in the example below, but it does not work if f is of type in this case just f.diff(x) works... Georg --~--~-~--~~~---~

[sage-support] Re: group rings question

2008-06-28 Thread John Cremona
It seems that what Dan Bump's instructions did not specify is what properties the class assigned to ._combinatorial_class must have. And it needs something which PermutationGroupElement does not have. Does that help? John 2008/6/28 David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi: > > Since there are s

[sage-support] group rings question

2008-06-28 Thread David Joyner
Hi: Since there are some interesting error-correcting codes based on group algebras over a finite field, I'm making a stab at implementing group rings for permutation groups. Dan Bump (offlist) suggested looking at the CombinatorialAlgebra class in sage.combinat.combinatorial_algebra.py. The docs

[sage-support] Re: sage and linux powerpc

2008-06-28 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 27, 7:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - "Bin Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Hi Bin, > Maybe I advanced a little in this problem. I found that your patch > ATLAS-3.8.1-ppc-g4-7447-detect-fix.patch is not applied in sage. After > applying this patch, it can detect architect