[sage-support] Re: notebook shows up as blank in firefox

2008-06-11 Thread louie
On Jun 10, 10:07 am, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > When I try to display some of the documentation notebooks, they turn > out partly or wholly blank in Firefox, especially the long ones (e.g. > 5.1 2d plotting). > > They work fine in Safari, so perhaps this is more a

[sage-support] Re: simplifying exponents

2008-06-11 Thread polo0691
Thanks, this was helpful > > Sometimes you can use 'assume' to get the behavior you want, however. In > this case, for example: > > sage: var('vgs vt n') > (vgs, vt, n) > sage: f = (vgs - vt)^n > sage: assume(vgs > vt) > sage: f^(1/n) > vgs - vt > sage: forget() > sage: f^(1/n) > ((vgs - vt)^n)

[sage-support] Re: piecewise defined functions and composition

2008-06-11 Thread David Joyner
I don't think composition of piecewise functions has been implemented yet. 2008/6/11 houp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello. > > I'd like to have some simple piecewise defined function like: > f = Piecewise([[[0,1],1]]) > and the composite it with some other function like > h = x - 1 > > I've tried s

[sage-support] piecewise defined functions and composition

2008-06-11 Thread houp
Hello. I'd like to have some simple piecewise defined function like: f = Piecewise([[[0,1],1]]) and the composite it with some other function like h = x - 1 I've tried somethine like this: f1 = lambda x:1 f2 = lambda x:x+2 f = piecewise([[[0,1],f1]]) f(f2) and it fails with: Traceback (most r

[sage-support] Re: Li(x) in the complex domain

2008-06-11 Thread M. Yurko
I forgot the code in the last post: def li(z): #def log integral for real and complex variables if z in RR and z >= 2: #check if real number greater than 2 return Li(z) + 1.04516378011749278484459194613136522615578151 #adjust for offset in SAGE def elif z == 0: return 0

[sage-support] Re: Li(x) in the complex domain

2008-06-11 Thread M. Yurko
I made a few modifications so it now works everywhere but (0,1) On Jun 11, 1:45 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:07 AM, M. Yurko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > O.K. I defined li(x) as follows: > > > def li(z): #def log integral for real and complex vari

[sage-support] Re: Li(x) in the complex domain

2008-06-11 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:07 AM, M. Yurko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > O.K. I defined li(x) as follows: > > def li(z): #def log integral for real and complex variables >if z in RR and z >= 2: #check if real number greater than 2 >return Li(z) + > 1.0451637801174927848445919461313

[sage-support] Re: Li(x) in the complex domain

2008-06-11 Thread M. Yurko
O.K. I defined li(x) as follows: def li(z): #def log integral for real and complex variables if z in RR and z >= 2: #check if real number greater than 2 return Li(z) + 1.04516378011749278484459194613136522615578151 #adjust for offset in SAGE def elif z == 1: return -in

[sage-support] Re: Li(x) in the complex domain

2008-06-11 Thread M. Yurko
O.K. I defined li(x) as follows: def li(z): #def log integral for real and complex variables if z in RR and z >= 2: #check if real number greater than 2 return Li(z) + 1.04516378011749278484459194613136522615578151 #adjust for offset in SAGE def elif z == 1: return -in

[sage-support] Re: print or view depending on context (was Re: python (?) help: equivalent of lisp's "let")

2008-06-11 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:28 AM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jun 10, 9:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:35 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Jun 10, 7:12 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[sage-support] Re: print or view depending on context (was Re: python (?) help: equivalent of lisp's "let")

2008-06-11 Thread John H Palmieri
On Jun 10, 9:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:35 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 10, 7:12 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:03 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

[sage-support] Re: Li(x) in the complex domain

2008-06-11 Thread M. Yurko
Sure. My current code is a bit messy, so I'll clean it up and make an example. However, one thing to note is that I defined my Li(x) starting from 0 ("American" convention), while the current Li(x) in SAGE (for positive reals) is defined starting at 2 ("offset"). On Jun 10, 11:02 pm, "William Ste