Thanks a lot.
With all the hints given, I am able to do all things that I initially
intended to do.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more o
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jason Grout wrote:
> >> > Lars Fischer wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >>> I think this feature re
> Hi
>
> I was going through a book(on quantum computation) , which uses
> tensor
> products. I wanted to experiment with these tensor products. Is there
> any function like tensor_product(), which will take 2 or more vectors
> as input and return their tensor product?
>
> I tried to searc
Adam Getchell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:55 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Adam
> Now, if we could get a port to OpenBSD (with privsep), I'd be less
> concerned with the security of the system. ;-)
Build a VMWare image, get it to William and I will take care of the
re
On Apr 23, 11:12 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andrzej,
> > > interesting, I built sage successfully and don't have those errors -
> > > using Arch and no SAGE_ANYTHING environment variables... I noticed I
> > > have other release data - was you trying 3.0 (later
Hi,
> > interesting, I built sage successfully and don't have those errors -
> > using Arch and no SAGE_ANYTHING environment variables... I noticed I
> > have other release data - was you trying 3.0 (later release - there
> > was second release, wasn't it?) - anyway - there's proof it works f
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>> > Lars Fischer wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >>> I think this feature request is reasonable, but the way to
>> >>> implement it is to just do it directly instead of includ
This would surely be easy to implement for vectors: if v and w have
respective entries v[i] for i in range(m), and w[j] for j in range(n)
then v.tensor_product(w) would have m*n entries v[i]*w[j] index by k
in range(m*n) where k=n*i+j. The only issue is whether i moves faster
than j instead (k
You can do so with matrices (so think of vectors as 1xn or nx1
matrices...):
sage: M = matrix(ZZ, [[1,0],[0,1]])
sage: N = matrix(ZZ, [[1,2],[3,4]])
sage: M.tensor_product(N)
[1 2|0 0]
[3 4|0 0]
[---+---]
[0 0|1 2]
[0 0|3 4]
On Apr 23, 11:14 am, vivek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was
On Apr 23, 7:02 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
> > > Linux. It works without any problem.
> > > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
> > > the following erro
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I recently installed sage on a Fedora Core 6 machine,
> and it appears that sage only runs when SELinux (secure linux) is
> disabled.
>
> When I run it w/ SELINUX=enforcing in /etc/sysconfig/selinux,
> I get "c
I recently installed sage on a Fedora Core 6 machine,
and it appears that sage only runs when SELinux (secure linux) is
disabled.
When I run it w/ SELINUX=enforcing in /etc/sysconfig/selinux,
I get "cannot restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied"
when I start sage.
Is this the case,
>
> I can do this tonight, and I'm happy to do it on a regular basis.
>
> david
This is very kind. My PPC takes MANY hours to compile Sage due to
lack of RAM, and when there are changes I want to try out the binary
is really helpful. I imagine a fair number of "quiet" users also
still have 10.4
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I haven't been
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I haven't been able to 'expand' trigonometric functions in Sage using
> > identities such as:
> > sin(x + y) = s
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Alyson Deines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I was just playing around with Sage, and I tried to animate
> sphere().
> Is this not implemented yet?
> What I did was this:
>
> L = [sphere((0,i,0))for i in range(10)]
>
> a = animate(L)
>
> a.show()
Hi
I was going through a book(on quantum computation) , which uses tensor
products. I wanted to experiment with these tensor products. Is there
any function like tensor_product(), which will take 2 or more vectors
as input and return their tensor product?
I tried to search but I couldn't find an
Hello,
I was just playing around with Sage, and I tried to animate
sphere().
Is this not implemented yet?
What I did was this:
L = [sphere((0,i,0))for i in range(10)]
a = animate(L)
a.show()
with each line in a different cell.
After a = animate(L) it graphed the last entry in L
and after a.s
Hello all,
I've posted a patch up on trac:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2519
And I've decided to move the technical discussion to sage-devel:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b6fcc3a134abe22c
Take care,
Franco
--
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:07 P
http://Crunchy.sf.net uses editarea,
and they had a rough test on FF3 with no complains on editor
http://groups.google.com/group/crunchy-discuss
there's a screenshot
http://popmokslas.projektas.lt/failai/etc/CrunchyEditor%e2%80%93FF.png
and js
http://www.koders.com/javascript/fidC214ECA4C1C5462D
Hi:
This is a problem:
sage: CC(spherical_harmonic(1,1,RR(pi/2),RR(pi/2)))
-1.20627379501958e-15 + 0.345494149471335*I
sage: CC(spherical_harmonic(1,1,pi/2,pi/2))
0.130735417217099 + 0.285662098159486*I
Does anyone know what is going on here?
meval is a function in
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sa
On Apr 23, 2008, at 12:47 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jim Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?
>
> Unfortunately I no longer have access to *any* OS X 10.5 powerpc
> machines.
> I personally don't own a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> while trying this:
> sage: gap.Factorization?
>
> I got this...
>
> Type:
> Definition: gap.Factorization( [noargspec] )
> Docstring:
> Help: several entries match this topic - type ?2 to get
Hi,
> > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
> > Linux. It works without any problem.
> > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
> > the following errors when I run the sage after finishing the
> > compilation successfully:
>
> I
I'll think about doing it, but it will take me a couple of days to
dedicate the time to the task.
Jim
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jim Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?
>
> Unf
Sage does have the Gamma function implemented for real and complex
arguments, but it does not seem able to treat it as a symbolic
function which can be passed to maxima. Is that something which could
be changed?
sage: factorial(5)
120
sage: factorial(5) == gamma(6)
True
sage: gamma(2.3)
1.166711
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?
Unfortunately I no longer have access to *any* OS X 10.5 powerpc machines.
I personally don't own any ppc machines, but I have access to three.
The owners of all three of
Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?Index of /SAGEbin/apple_osx/powerpc Name Last modified Size Description Parent Directory - README.txt
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I haven't been able to 'expand' trigonometric functions in Sage using
> identities such as:
> sin(x + y) = sin(x)*cos(y) + sin(y)*cos(x)
>
> Is this currently implemented?
sage:
sage: var('x,y')
(x, y)
s
On Apr 23, 6:12 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
> at the URL you
> gave under "Methods implemented:" but doesn't seem to be there now. Anyway,
> you can try this:
>
> sage: maxima.eval("elliptic_kc (0.5)")
> '1.
Hi,
I haven't been able to 'expand' trigonometric functions in Sage using
identities such as:
sin(x + y) = sin(x)*cos(y) + sin(y)*cos(x)
Is this currently implemented?
Thanks in advance,
--
Hector
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-s
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
> > Lars Fischer wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>> I think this feature request is reasonable, but the way to
> >>> implement it is to just do it directly instead of including a
> >>> full javascript
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:24 AM, gerhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Is there a preferred way to set up a directory for worksheets?
>
> I had some problems with creating worksheets,
> which I "solved" by
> - creating a directory and setting permissions
> - using the directory argument fo
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:12 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
> > at the URL you
> > gave under "Methods implemented:" but
* Is there a preferred way to set up a directory for worksheets?
I had some problems with creating worksheets,
which I "solved" by
- creating a directory and setting permissions
- using the directory argument for the notebook
- setting the environmental variable USER to point to it's parent
Prob
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:12 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
> at the URL you
> gave under "Methods implemented:" but doesn't seem to be there now. Anyway,
> you can try this:
>
> sage: maxima.eval("elliptic_
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Helio Perroni Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to use SAGE to find the positive infinity limit of this
> function:
>
> f(x) = ln(x^x) / ln(x!)
>
> However, if I try defining it in SAGE like this:
>
> f(x) = ln(x^x) / ln(factorial(x
[Note: If you are interested in announcements only please subscribe to
sage-announce. It is limited to roughly one email every ten days.]
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0 has been released on April 21st, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagema
I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
at the URL you
gave under "Methods implemented:" but doesn't seem to be there now. Anyway,
you can try this:
sage: maxima.eval("elliptic_kc (0.5)")
'1.854074677301372'
or
sage: RR(maxima.eval("elliptic_kc (0.5)"))
1.854074677301
On Apr 23, 12:18 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Osman,
> I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
> Linux. It works without any problem.
> However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
> the following errors when I run the sage aft
Hi,
I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
Linux. It works without any problem.
However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
the following errors when I run the sage after finishing the
compilation successfully:
41 matches
Mail list logo
