I have the same problem, I have not tried the SAGE on the console.
I also want to do the same. Have you managed to solve the problem?
Thanks
Roger,
On Apr 3, 4:15 am, bourba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31 mar, 00:15, bourba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 30 mar, 22:37, "William
> > > We have real(x) is just x in Sage:
>
> > > sage: t = real(x)
> > > t
> > > sage: t
> > > x
Wow, that is a problem, all right.
Is there a workaround not involving defining CDF or another ring at
this time? (I assume the answer is no, but I hope the answer is
yes.) I want to use
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:11 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:48 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tried on sagenb.org:
> > >
> > > sage: t=re
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:11 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:48 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tried on sagenb.org:
> >
> > sage: t=real(x)
> > sage: imag(real(i));imag(t(i))
> > 0.0
> > 1.0
>
> We have real(x) is just x in Sa
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:48 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tried on sagenb.org:
>
> sage: t=real(x)
> sage: imag(real(i));imag(t(i))
> 0.0
> 1.0
We have real(x) is just x in Sage:
sage: t = real(x)
t
sage: t
x
This is *because* of Maxima, which stupidly does this:
sage: !maxi
Tried on sagenb.org:
sage: t=real(x)
sage: imag(real(i));imag(t(i))
0.0
1.0
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group
Glad these are already known. Here's some followup:
What should be the expected behavior of the following? I present
analogies.
1. If
sage: plot(1)
should now give a line, as suggested above because of common use, then
one might think
sage: plot((0,1))
would give a point in 2-space?
2. If
sage:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:50 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2:43 pm, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just started using Sage on my Mac, I use Firefox 3 Beta 5 as my
> > browser -- It seems as though Sage will not work with this version of
> > F
On Apr 8, 2:43 pm, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just started using Sage on my Mac, I use Firefox 3 Beta 5 as my
> browser -- It seems as though Sage will not work with this version of
> Firefox due to the certificate being invalid -- it gives the following
> error message:
>
>
Hi,
I've just started using Sage on my Mac, I use Firefox 3 Beta 5 as my
browser -- It seems as though Sage will not work with this version of
Firefox due to the certificate being invalid -- it gives the following
error message:
---
Certificate key usage inadequate for attempted operation.
(Err
On Apr 8, 2:30 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel B. Mohler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2008 02:10:35 am Dan Drake wrote:
> > Some relevant trac tickets are:
> >http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2410
> >http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2409
>
> > I believe tha
Joel B. Mohler wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008 02:10:35 am Dan Drake wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 at 08:10PM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
>>> Final comment - are both related to
>>> sage: parametric_plot((0,t),0,1)
>>> not working, which is consistent with
>>> sage: plot(1)
>>> not returning a horizo
sage: from pylab import *
sage: imshow([[(0,0,0)]])
sage: savefig('foo.png')
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NameError: global name 'npy' is not defined
I would just like to make an image from a 2-dimensional Array (of
rgb-values)!
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 02:10:35 am Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 at 08:10PM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> > Final comment - are both related to
> > sage: parametric_plot((0,t),0,1)
> > not working, which is consistent with
> > sage: plot(1)
> > not returning a horizontal line, but (sort of)
Dear Dan,
On Apr 8, 8:10 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> plot(2, x, -1, 1)
>
> I *don't* want to see the numeral "2" printed at the origin, and I can't
> imagine anybody who would.
I partially agree:
"Partially", because sometimes one *does* want to plot something
different from a f
> Was this change intended?
Hello, No, this is probably a scripting problem by google. They are
redesigning a lot all the time ;)
I've made the box bigger, this should fix this until I have a better
solution.
Harald
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, se
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr, 16:47, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wr
17 matches
Mail list logo
