On Mar 6, 2:48 pm, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can confirm this. I think numbers are rounded up when they are
> > printed, which leads to confusion:
> > {{{
> > sage: num = RealField(12).random_element(1,9.99)*100
> > sage: num
> > 406.
> > }}}
>
> > But num is actually ~40
Carl Witty wrote:
> On Mar 6, 12:53 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As another option, though, how about
>> having the S or Sage namespace include all of the global namespace (at
>> least the default global namespace), so that S.pi (or Sage.pi) would
>> always refer to the sage syste
"didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Anyway to get what I expected to get I can do something like
>>
>> sage: Integer(sage_eval(str(num))*100)
>> 318
>>
>> but it seems like an ugly hack. Is there
Hi,
So, I rebuilt clisp and then maxima built properly. Regarding the
sage error, I tried to build gmp-4.2.1 using a gcc wrapper where I eat
up the -m64 argument. This wrapper internally calls /usr/bin/gcc. This
way, when I invoke:
% gcc -m64 -c foo.c
it builds a 32 bit object. When I installed
On Mar 6, 11:20 am, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use the reduce() command on a rational pollynomial. I
> first clear the denominator by multiplying by the denominator but when
> I use reduce() I get an error. When I print out the polynomial it is
> no longer rational but SAG
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 3:46 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the real problem here is that Sage by default has so many
> > identifiers in the global namespace. I don't really like having so
> > many names there
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that the notebook is never launched to bound to a specific
> interface. Could you please file a trac# against this?
>
> The specific issue is that in twistedconf.tac, we start the server like so:
Ah ha! This us
The problem is that the notebook is never launched to bound to a specific
interface. Could you please file a trac# against this?
The specific issue is that in twistedconf.tac, we start the server like so:
strports.service('tls:8000:privateKey=/Users/yqiang/.sage/notebook/private.pem:certKey=/User
On Mar 6, 3:46 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the real problem here is that Sage by default has so many
> identifiers in the global namespace. I don't really like having so
> many names there. I think it was a deliberate design decision in
> python to keep the global namespa
On Mar 6, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Hector Villafuerte wrote:
>> That one *does* currently give a syntax error, because lambda really
>> is a python keyword. But there aren't too many python keywords. Off
>> the top of my head:
>
> Hi David, I'm aware of that behavior currently happening (the syntax
On Mar 6, 12:53 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As another option, though, how about
> having the S or Sage namespace include all of the global namespace (at
> least the default global namespace), so that S.pi (or Sage.pi) would
> always refer to the sage system pi (as opposed to havi
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:05 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Hector Villafuerte wrote:
...
> > Yep, that's what I meant (reserved words, aka keywords); to expect
> > behavior like this:
> >
> > sage: lambda = 5
> > Syntax Error:
> > lambda =
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello group,
> >>
> >> Is the following behavior a bug, or am I mi
On Mar 6, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Hector Villafuerte wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>>> What does "reserved words" mean? Do you mean that we should
>>> throw an
>>> error when those variables are assigned? I don't think that
>>> w
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > What does "reserved words" mean? Do you mean that we should throw an
> > error when those variables are assigned? I don't think that would be
> > possible without some deep tinkering in python.
Hi Jason
"didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello group,
>>
>> Is the following behavior a bug, or am I missing some fundamental
>> understanding about how Integer works?
>>
>> ,
>> | sage: num = Real
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hector Villafuerte wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this just happened to me (maybe because I'm annoyingly slow today...):
> >
> > sage: var('t')
> > sage: x(t) = sin(2*pi*1000*t) + 1/2*sin(2*pi*2000*t + 3/4*pi)
> >
> > Exceptio
On Mar 6, 2008, at 11:20 AM, David wrote:
>
> I am trying to use the reduce() command on a rational pollynomial. I
> first clear the denominator by multiplying by the denominator but when
> I use reduce() I get an error. When I print out the polynomial it is
> no longer rational but SAGE doesn
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Nikos Apostolakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello group,
>
> Is the following behavior a bug, or am I missing some fundamental
> understanding about how Integer works?
>
> ,
> | sage: num = RealField(12).random_element(1,9.99)
> | sage: num
> | 3.18
On Thursday 06 March 2008, David wrote:
> I am trying to use the reduce() command on a rational pollynomial. I
> first clear the denominator by multiplying by the denominator but when
> I use reduce() I get an error. When I print out the polynomial it is
> no longer rational but SAGE doesn't lik
Hello group,
Is the following behavior a bug, or am I missing some fundamental
understanding about how Integer works?
,
| sage: num = RealField(12).random_element(1,9.99)
| sage: num
| 3.18
| sage: num*100
| 318.
| sage: Integer(_)
| -
Dear David,
On Mar 6, 9:47 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just an observation - both Scientific Linux and OpenSUSE are rpm-based.
> I wonder if this can be duplicated on a redhat machine.
I have no idea what rpm-based means, but i would be surprised if it
were caused by my Linux
Hector Villafuerte wrote:
> Hi,
> this just happened to me (maybe because I'm annoyingly slow today...):
>
> sage: var('t')
> sage: x(t) = sin(2*pi*1000*t) + 1/2*sin(2*pi*2000*t + 3/4*pi)
>
> Exception (click to the left for traceback):
> ...
> TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': '
Sorry for coming back on that problem.
I re-bootet my computer, and i downloaded the binary sage-2.10.2-
linux-64bit-opteron-x86_64-Linux (i hope this is the correct one for
my machine).
Still, i can reproduce the above error.
What can be the reason?
It isn't my compiler (because it occurs with
Just an observation - both Scientific Linux and OpenSUSE are rpm-based.
I wonder if this can be duplicated on a redhat machine.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:35 PM, parombouts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Simon King wrote:
> > Dear William,
> >
> > On Mar 5, 11:51 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL
Hi,
this just happened to me (maybe because I'm annoyingly slow today...):
sage: var('t')
sage: x(t) = sin(2*pi*1000*t) + 1/2*sin(2*pi*2000*t + 3/4*pi)
Exception (click to the left for traceback):
...
TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '*': 'Integer Ring' and
''
It took me about 10
Simon King wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> On Mar 5, 11:51 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, I just tried to replicate your problem above on sage.math (64-bit
> > linux),
> > 32-bit athlon linux, and 32-bit OS X 10.5, and in every case your code above
> > works fine -- i.e., not
I am trying to use the reduce() command on a rational pollynomial. I
first clear the denominator by multiplying by the denominator but when
I use reduce() I get an error. When I print out the polynomial it is
no longer rational but SAGE doesn't like it. I would appriciate any
advice. Below is
Neal wrote:
> First, thanks to everyone for their suggestions.
>
> But, I'm not quite there yet.
>
> When I typed (address='192.168.1.103'), Firefox still popped up on my
> MAC,
> but with the machine address, not localhost. I still could not attach
> from the PC.
> I thought maybe the local co
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Neal Laurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I have just installed SAGE on my MAC book, and it works fine there. But
>> >> I would like
First, thanks to everyone for their suggestions.
But, I'm not quite there yet.
When I typed (address='192.168.1.103'), Firefox still popped up on my
MAC,
but with the machine address, not localhost. I still could not attach
from the PC.
I thought maybe the local copy of Firefox was getting in t
On Mar 6, 1:47 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > William,
> > Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I had not set it. Some more
> > problems with the compile on powerpc Linux. I get:
> > ./lisp.run -on-error
Hi,
On Mar 6, 5:31 am, "bryan newbold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had some luck running the sage-2.10.2-linux-32bit-debian-i686-Linux
> binaries under FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE (manually upgraded) using linux emulation
> (linux_base-fc-4_10 = fedora core 4.10 distribution files); basic calculus
33 matches
Mail list logo
