[sage-support] Re: matrix_plot axes ranges

Thank you very much. The numbering in the axes now appear as zeros (in fact just one zero in the middle of each axe), so there is no clue on the min and max values of the variables. Thanks again and regards On Feb 17, 7:31 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008 10:19 P

[sage-support] Re: matrix_plot axes ranges

On Feb 16, 2008 10:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all. > > I have a Matrix of, say, 64x64 and I plot it using matrix_plot(). It > is a fractal that fills the square [0,1]x[0,1] so I want to keep a 2D > view. I would like to change the x,y axes ranging values to be in

[sage-support] matrix_plot axes ranges

Hello all. I have a Matrix of, say, 64x64 and I plot it using matrix_plot(). It is a fractal that fills the square [0,1]x[0,1] so I want to keep a 2D view. I would like to change the x,y axes ranging values to be in the interval [0,1] rather than in {0, ..., 63}. I don't know how to do it. Maybe

[sage-support] Re: sage-newbie list and sage-support list

John wrote: > Did you reply to User 1 trying to convince him/her to try again but to > use sage-support? As Sage does actually provide amazingly good > support )via this list for example) it would be a great pity if false > rumours to the contrary were to spread. I just emailed him and explaine

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

Hi, > Matthias, > > I saw the problem too on my Ubuntu 7.10 computers too. Thanks for the > motivation to make the time to fix it :). I do remember complaining about the fact that the notebook is launched with its own code instead of the new infrastructure. I never filed a bug report, but I a

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

mabshoff wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 10:38 pm, Matthias Hillenbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Hi Michael, > > Hi Matthias, > >> Thank you very much for your help. I am looking forward to the next >> release of SAGE. > > I didn't really do much, I just ended up writing a couple emails :). >

[sage-support] Re: Extreme Newbie Development Questions

dean moore wrote: > OK, there seems an interest in us relatively new folk contributing code > for SAGE. > Admirable. More than I get from M*cr*s*ft. Or Apple. Thanks. I mean it. > > Surfing Wikipedia, I came upon the animated graph at > < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypotrochoid >, and thou

[sage-support] Re: Bessel argument order

On Feb 16, 2008 5:46 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Feb 16, 11:38 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi David, > > > Micheal suggested replacing all "#random's" by "..." and > > William seconded this. Then William suggested adding the scip option to > > the funct

[sage-support] Re: sage-newbie list and sage-support list

David wrote: > > (1) send an email to both sage-forum and sage-newbie announcing that > > the lists will be closed, and all people signed up for them should instead > > sign up for sage-support, > > Done. I did not see a "list closing" email on the sage-newbie list. Did I miss it? If not,

[sage-support] Re: Extreme Newbie Development Questions

On Feb 16, 11:34 pm, "dean moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, there seems an interest in us relatively new folk contributing code for > SAGE. > Admirable. More than I get from M*cr*s*ft. Or Apple. Thanks. I mean it. > > Surfing Wikipedia, I came upon the animated graph at >

[sage-support] Re: Bessel argument order

On Feb 16, 11:38 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi David, > Micheal suggested replacing all "#random's" by "..." and > William seconded this. Then William suggested adding the scip option to > the functions implemented. This has been done as well. > The patch passes "sage -t" ha

[sage-support] Re: Extreme Newbie Development Questions

On Feb 16, 2008 5:34 PM, dean moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, there seems an interest in us relatively new folk contributing code for > SAGE. > Admirable. More than I get from M*cr*s*ft. Or Apple. Thanks. I mean it. > > Surfing Wikipedia, I came upon the animated graph at > < http://en

[sage-support] Re: Bessel argument order

Micheal suggested replacing all "#random's" by "..." and William seconded this. Then William suggested adding the scip option to the functions implemented. This has been done as well. The patch passes "sage -t" has some examples added and some docstring typos fixed. It can be found at: http://sage

[sage-support] Re: Sage Installation - Problem with untar-ing Linux Binaries

Thank you very much. I indeed had to follow a round-about way of installing because of the incomplete download of the tar file. The problem is fixed now and SAGE is working fine. Thanks and Best Regards Kishore On Feb 15, 5:52 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2:4

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

On Feb 16, 10:38 pm, Matthias Hillenbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi Matthias, > Thank you very much for your help. I am looking forward to the next > release of SAGE. I didn't really do much, I just ended up writing a couple emails :). We are tracking the issue at http://tr

[sage-support] Re: Extraction problem - Sage Windows bin

Thanks, I have now got it done. cheers, Jen On Feb 16, 10:29 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Feb 16, 3:49 am, tangent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > I am having trouble decompressing sage-vmware-2.10.1.7z I have now > > downloaded it twice as I originally thoug

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

Hi Michael, Thank you very much for your help. I am looking forward to the next release of SAGE. Matthias --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For m

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

On Feb 16, 6:06 pm, Matthias Hillenbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There seems to be no difference between the output form 'env' before > and after starting the notebook. Hi Matthias, Jason Grout has figured out what the problem is and will probably post a patch in the next 24 hours or so t

[sage-support] Re: Multiple Plots with different colors

But try some code as follows; tweak as you like: x = var('x') g1 = plot(sin(x), 0, 2*pi, rgbcolor=(0,0,1)) g2 = plot(cos(x), 0, 2*pi, rgbcolor=(1,0,0), linestyle = "--") g1 + g2# show their sum See attached file. Dean --- On Feb 16, 2008 11:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[sage-support] Re: Extreme Newbie Development Questions

kcrisman wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 12:05 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Feb 15, 2008 8:27 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> The bottom line is this: If William's goal is really to have *every* >>> user be a developer (or at least to contribute very minor >>

[sage-support] Re: optional_packages() error

On Feb 16, 2008 9:17 AM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > William wrote: > > > Does the user running sage have write permissions to > > > > /opt/sage-2.10-debian32-i686-Linux/tmp? > > No, but what confused me was when I executed optional_packages on the > public Sage server it gave a p

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

On Saturday 16 February 2008, Alex Ghitza wrote: > Sorry I don't have any feedback on your actual question, but > there is an easier way to get the contents of your worksheet > than what you describe: on the upper right side of the page > there are 6 blue buttons. The third one is called "Text";

[sage-support] Re: Odd behaviour of parametric_plot

On Saturday 16 February 2008, Carl Witty wrote: > On Feb 12, 2:07 am, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wanted to make a plot of x^3+y^3=1729 (the well-known taxicab problem). > > I'm sure there are better ways of acieving this but I opted for a naive > > approach: > > > > {{{ > > def s

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

On Saturday 16 February 2008, Carl Witty wrote: > On Feb 16, 6:59 am, "bill.p" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > def f(x): > > y = 1729 - x^3 > > return sgn(y) * abs(y)^(1/3) > > ... > > > f = parametric_plot((x,line((12,1),(9,10),x)),8,18) > > You are defining f twice, first as a function then a

[sage-support] Re: Multiple Plots with different colors

On Feb 16, 2008 10:21 AM, D. M. Monarres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > First of all, I would like to thank all of the sage developers. Sage > has been a very useful tool for both graduate work and teaching. > > I have a question about plotting. The plot function allows for a list >

[sage-support] Re: Multiple Plots with different colors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 D. M. Monarres wrote: | Hello all, | | First of all, I would like to thank all of the sage developers. Sage | has been a very useful tool for both graduate work and teaching. | | I have a question about plotting. The plot function allows for a list

[sage-support] Multiple Plots with different colors

Hello all, First of all, I would like to thank all of the sage developers. Sage has been a very useful tool for both graduate work and teaching. I have a question about plotting. The plot function allows for a list of functions as an argument, is there any way that I could specify the plot

[sage-support] Re: optional_packages() error

William wrote: > Does the user running sage have write permissions to > > /opt/sage-2.10-debian32-i686-Linux/tmp? No, but what confused me was when I executed optional_packages on the public Sage server it gave a permission error on a slightly different directory along with extra information

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

Hi Michael, the last version I used before upgrading was 2.9.2. here is the output of 'env' before and after starting the notebook. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage$ ./sage

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

There seems to be no difference between the output form 'env' before and after starting the notebook. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more op

[sage-support] Re: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

On Feb 16, 5:31 pm, Matthias Hillenbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi Matthias, > Since I have upgraded to SAGE 2.10.x I get the following error message > when starting the notebook: > > gnome-www-browser: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: > undefined symbol: gzopen64 The

[sage-support] symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64

Hello, Since I have upgraded to SAGE 2.10.x I get the following error message when starting the notebook: gnome-www-browser: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64 I get this error message on two different computers (one running Ubuntu 7.10 the other Debian Testi

[sage-support] Re: Typo in Sage Reference Manual

On Feb 12, 2:16 am, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just spotted what I think is a typo in the Reference manual: > module-sage.plot.plot.html > Scroll down about two screen-fulls and I find the line: > > We combine together different graphics objects using ``62#6 '': > > What's that b

[sage-support] Re: Extreme Newbie Development Questions

On Feb 16, 12:05 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 15, 2008 8:27 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The bottom line is this: If William's goal is really to have *every* > > user be a developer (or at least to contribute very minor > > documentation correction

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 bill.p wrote: | Sorry, Carl, it's | http://www.billp.org/Fermat_1729.sws | | Here's my transcript of the notebook for David. Firefox wouldn't let | me copy/paste from the notebook! | Ended up pressing the 'print' link, then doing File/save-as on

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

On Feb 16, 6:59 am, "bill.p" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > def f(x): > y = 1729 - x^3 > return sgn(y) * abs(y)^(1/3) ... > f = parametric_plot((x,line((12,1),(9,10),x)),8,18) You are defining f twice, first as a function then as a graphics object. You need to pick a different name for one or

[sage-support] Re: Odd behaviour of parametric_plot

On Feb 12, 2:07 am, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanted to make a plot of x^3+y^3=1729 (the well-known taxicab problem). > I'm sure there are better ways of acieving this but I opted for a naive > approach: > > {{{ > def sng(x): > if x < 0: > return -1 > return 1 > > def f(x)

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

Sorry, Carl, it's http://www.billp.org/Fermat_1729.sws Here's my transcript of the notebook for David. Firefox wouldn't let me copy/paste from the notebook! Ended up pressing the 'print' link, then doing File/save-as on that and then editing out all the HTML junk. --

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

On Feb 12, 3:47 am, "bill.p" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Notebook is getting rather long now, so I've saved it to a file: > > http://www.billp.org/Fermat-1729.sws When I try to download this, I get "ERROR 404: Not Found". Carl --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To p

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

Sorry, I don't use the notebook (command-line only), but if you could paste the code you are trying to run I can look at it and see if I can spot something. On Feb 16, 2008 5:07 AM, bill.p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a brief note to re-raise this problem. No-one seems interested... > a p

[sage-support] Re: Odd behaviour of parametric_plot

I don't know how to fix it so that parametric_plot works. However, the following workaround at least gives you a plot: sage: a = RR(1729^(1/3)) sage: f1 = lambda x: RR(real((1729 - x^3)^(1/3))) sage: f2 = lambda x: RR(real(-(-1729 + x^3)^(1/3))) sage: L1 = [(x,f1(x)) for x in srange(-a+0.1,-15,0.

[sage-support] Re: Extraction problem - Sage Windows bin

On Feb 16, 3:49 am, tangent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I am having trouble decompressing sage-vmware-2.10.1.7z I have now > downloaded it twice as I originally thought the file had been > corrupted during the download. > > Using the 7z file manager, it returns an error message for each

[sage-support] Re: optional_packages() error

On Feb 16, 7:43 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 15, 2008 10:16 PM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > When I execute the optional_packages() function in a worksheet, I > > receive the following error: > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > Fil

[sage-support] Re: Odd behaviour of parametric_plot

> Still no response to this problem, either > > Bill Generally speaking: Sage Days somewhere (IPAM in this case) tend to drop the amount of people that deal with problems on the mailing list before, during and after the work shop because people have to travel, get ready for the workshop and

[sage-support] Re: Odd behaviour of parametric_plot

On Feb 12, 10:07 am, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanted to make a plot of x^3+y^3=1729 (the well-known taxicab problem). > I'm sure there are better ways of acieving this but I opted for a naive > approach: > > {{{ > def sng(x): > if x < 0: > return -1 > return 1 > > def f

[sage-support] Re: Another possible bug in parametric_plot/show

Just a brief note to re-raise this problem. No-one seems interested... a pity as I still haven't been able to figure out how to work around it. Bill --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this gr