On Feb 11, 2008 8:52 AM, Georg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ohh yes.., this was a very bad demonstration of the real problem,
> actually i have a for loop in my .spyx file (for a quick and dirty
> matrix exponentiation):
> s = sage.all_cmdline
> for i in s.srange(1, k):
>factor = factor * M
Ohh yes.., this was a very bad demonstration of the real problem,
actually i have a for loop in my .spyx file (for a quick and dirty
matrix exponentiation):
s = sage.all_cmdline
for i in s.srange(1, k):
factor = factor * M * (1/k)
srange applied in an .spyx file, i.e. without preparsin
On Feb 11, 2008 4:54 AM, Georg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> using sage-2.10.1 on a 32-bit core duo with Debian Etch,
> considering 2 simple files,
> sa.sage:
>
> load "sb.spyx"
> def matmul(M):
> return M * (1/2)
spyx files are not "preparsed", so 1/2 is a Python "1/2", which is
just
Jurgis Pralgauskis wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>> If not ==, what would you propose for creating symbolic expression
>>> objects? The other obvious choice is eq(f, g), but I think that this
>>> is inferior since it is much harder to guess.
>> How often does one need an equation *outside solve*? I never di
Hi,
using sage-2.10.1 on a 32-bit core duo with Debian Etch,
considering 2 simple files,
sa.sage:
load "sb.spyx"
def matmul(M):
return M * (1/2)
sb.spyx:
def matmulspyx(M):
return M * (1/2)
--
| SAGE Version 2.10.1, Re
