On Dec 12, 2007 10:10 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 10:00 PM, pgdoyle <> wrote:
> > Hi William,
> >
> > If we set up a sage notebook server on a machine with mathematica
> > installed, and let the general public sign up for accounts,
> > then the general public wil
On Dec 12, 2007 10:00 PM, pgdoyle <> wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> If we set up a sage notebook server on a machine with mathematica
> installed, and let the general public sign up for accounts,
> then the general public will be able to run mathematica through the
> sage browser. And without having lo
On Dec 12, 2007 9:05 PM, Thomas :
> Bill,
> I had to learn C in graduate school as a medicinal chemist. But I
> didn't do any programming since then (1985!). Then several years back
> I had the responsibility to administer a couple of unix machines and
> decided that I would learn a "scripting" la
On Dec 12, 2007 3:18 PM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I'll actually be posting a vague pie in the sky grant proposal to
> > sage-* for feedback in about 3 or 4 days
> > about improving special functions in Sage
> >
>
> This sounds like a very good idea. One of the main things I
> I'll actually be posting a vague pie in the sky grant proposal to
> sage-* for feedback in about 3 or 4 days
> about improving special functions in Sage
>
This sounds like a very good idea. One of the main things I worry
about missing from Mathematica is all the special functions.
This is
Say I want to get Mathematica to compute some function that Sage can't
compute for me. What is the best way to pipe the arguments into
Mathematica, and then get the answer back into the world of sage?
Here's what I tried:
sage: def math_bessel_K(nu,x):
... m=mathematica('N[BesselK['+str(mat
On Dec 12, 2007 2:44 PM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To get back to the question of argument order, it seems strange to me
> that
> pari(2).besselk(3)
> should meant K_2(3) rather than K_3(2).
>
> sage: pari(2).besselk(3)
> 0.06151045847174203765682007145
> sage: bessel_K(2,3)
> 0.06151
To get back to the question of argument order, it seems strange to me
that
pari(2).besselk(3)
should meant K_2(3) rather than K_3(2).
sage: pari(2).besselk(3)
0.06151045847174203765682007145
sage: bessel_K(2,3)
0.0615104584717420
bessel_K(nu,x) is written K_nu(x) because the first argument nu is
On Dec 12, 2007 12:38 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 12:22 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > The question:
> > > > Is there any way to get SAGE to update a graphic without actually
> > > > creating a new graphic, either in command
On Dec 12, 2007 8:16 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Congratulations on the slashdotting! Amazing how many things get
> verbed nowadays ;)
>
> All this publicity has led some of my colleagues to finally notice
> SAGE, and one had a very nice question about whether it can do
> everythi
kcrisman wrote:
> Is there any way to get SAGE to update a graphic without actually
> creating a new graphic, either in command-line mode or in notebook?
> Obviously flooding the screen with graphics is not what he has in
> mind, but I couldn't find any documentation on whether this was
> possibl
On Dec 12, 3:38 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 12:22 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > The question:
> > > > Is there any way to get SAGE to update a graphic without actually
> > > > creating a new graphic, either in command-line mode or
On Dec 12, 2007 12:22 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > > The question:
> > > Is there any way to get SAGE to update a graphic without actually
> > > creating a new graphic, either in command-line mode or in notebook?
> >
> > Would creating an animation be a reasonable substi
>
> > The question:
> > Is there any way to get SAGE to update a graphic without actually
> > creating a new graphic, either in command-line mode or in notebook?
>
> Would creating an animation be a reasonable substitute?
> E.g.,
>
> {{{id=119|
> a = random_matrix(GF(37),10)*10
> b = [a^i for i
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cliff Sojourner <>
Date: Dec 12, 2007 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: SAGE trouble on RHL FC3
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks for your quick reply!
I will rebuild from source, if you don't hear anything then I got it to work :)
we're already ta
On Dec 12, 2007 10:44 AM, Cliff Sojourner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> having trouble with google groups (it says I joined the sage-support group
> but won't let me post anything to the list) - sorry to bother you.
>
> I'm eager to try SAGE so I downloaded
> /sage-2.8.15-rhel-32bit-i686
On Dec 12, 2007 7:55 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tried to test it... but funny things, at first I wasn't able to
> install any package... take a look at this:
>
> gcc -std=gnu99 -I/opt/sage/local/lib/r//include -I/opt/sage/local/lib/
> r//include -I/usr/local/include WARN
On Dec 12, 2007 7:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I need to use non-english characters (in comments) in Notebook
> worksheet.
> While working, they're shown w/o problem, but if I save ("download to
> file") worksheet, then close
> SAGE, then open again and load
On Dec 12, 2007 8:16 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations on the slashdotting! Amazing how many things get
> verbed nowadays ;)
>
> All this publicity has led some of my colleagues to finally notice
> SAGE, and one had a very nice question about whether it can do
> everything
Hi all,
I need to use non-english characters (in comments) in Notebook
worksheet.
While working, they're shown w/o problem, but if I save ("download to
file") worksheet, then close
SAGE, then open again and load .sws file, sometimes (!) I see just
unicode codes (like %u4041)
instead of my chars.
Congratulations on the slashdotting! Amazing how many things get
verbed nowadays ;)
All this publicity has led some of my colleagues to finally notice
SAGE, and one had a very nice question about whether it can do
everything MATLAB does. In particular, there was a real-time viewing
of the 2-d I
tried to test it... but funny things, at first I wasn't able to
install any package... take a look at this:
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/opt/sage/local/lib/r//include -I/opt/sage/local/lib/
r//include -I/usr/local/include WARNING: ignoring environment value
of R_HOME -fvisibility=hidden -fpic -I/opt/sage
> > even better would be to adopt a computational model such that all
> > numerical computations can give only *one* correct result. Then you
> > could simply compare to the expected result with utilities like "diff".
>
> That would be nice but isn't realistic, since Sage includes systems like
>
On Dec 12, 2007 5:30 AM, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > >sage: pari('2').besselk(3) # random
> > > "Random" here doesn't mean what you think. [...]
> > We really need to kill all of those and add "..." to account for the
> > imprecision caused by different CPUs/operating sys
> > > >sage: pari('2').besselk(3) # random
> > "Random" here doesn't mean what you think. [...]
> We really need to kill all of those and add "..." to account for the
> imprecision caused by different CPUs/operating systems/compilers.
even better would be to adopt a computational model such that
On Dec 12, 11:50 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 3:20 AM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The description of Bessel_K functions in the Sage Cookbook is
> > confusing about the order of the arguments.
> >http://sagemath.org/doc/html/const/node96.ht
On Dec 12, 2007 4:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to SAGE, but using it with growing enthusiasm :-)
> Question:
> I have a number of MathCad filed (*.mcd) that I'd like to convert to
> SAGE.
> Is there a way of doing this automatically?
As far as I kn
On Dec 12, 2007 3:20 AM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The description of Bessel_K functions in the Sage Cookbook is
> confusing about the order of the arguments.
> http://sagemath.org/doc/html/const/node96.html
> Here's what it says:
>
> >Here's an example using SAGE's interface to pari'
Hi all,
I'm new to SAGE, but using it with growing enthusiasm :-)
Question:
I have a number of MathCad filed (*.mcd) that I'd like to convert to
SAGE.
Is there a way of doing this automatically?
Any info highly appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
The description of Bessel_K functions in the Sage Cookbook is
confusing about the order of the arguments.
http://sagemath.org/doc/html/const/node96.html
Here's what it says:
>Here's an example using SAGE's interface to pari's special functions.
>sage: pari('2+I').besselk(3)
>0.045590771840755058
30 matches
Mail list logo
