For those people who are having trouble getting started with SAGE
after installing it, the following "Getting Started With Sage"
document may be helpful:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/tkosan/newbies_book/short_version/
If you find these instructions to be useful, let me know and I will
lo
On Dec 10, 2007 11:32 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 11:05 AM, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I upgraded my SAGE install from feisty to gutsy by adding XUbuntu via:
>
> I assume you're using sage-vmware?
>
> > sudo apt-get install x
On Dec 10, 2007 6:35 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 5:44 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi:
> > > It seems like I saw this reported already but can't find it now.
> >
On Dec 10, 2007 6:35 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 5:44 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi:
> > > It seems like I saw this reported already but can't find it now.
> >
On Dec 10, 2007 9:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 5:44 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi:
> > It seems like I saw this reported already but can't find it now.
> > I'm thinking I'm doing something stupid, but can't figure it out
> > and was w
On Dec 10, 2007 5:44 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi:
> It seems like I saw this reported already but can't find it now.
> I'm thinking I'm doing something stupid, but can't figure it out
> and was wondering if someone on this list can see the problem.
>
> My usual procedure for
On Dec 10, 2007 8:29 PM, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all. I just opened ticket #1457 (see below)
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1457
>
> The following is hopefully pretty self explanatory:
>
> ---
>
> The following took place on a
Hi:
It seems like I saw this reported already but can't find it now.
I'm thinking I'm doing something stupid, but can't figure it out
and was wondering if someone on this list can see the problem.
My usual procedure for creating a patch is as follows:
1. Take a file I want to edit, say linear_co
Thanks for reporting this, Dan! It's now
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1456
On Dec 10, 2007 7:48 PM, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> There are some problems with the function gaussian_binomial
> in sage 2.8.14. The help string contains a typo:
>
> binom{n}{k}_q = frac{(1-q^m
On Dec 11, 1:48 am, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some problems with the function gaussian_binomial
> in sage 2.8.14. The help string contains a typo:
>
> binom{n}{k}_q = frac{(1-q^m)(1-q^{m-1})... (1-q^{m-r+1})}
> {(1-q)(1-q^2)... (1-q^r)}.
>
> The typ
There are some problems with the function gaussian_binomial
in sage 2.8.14. The help string contains a typo:
binom{n}{k}_q = frac{(1-q^m)(1-q^{m-1})... (1-q^{m-r+1})}
{(1-q)(1-q^2)... (1-q^r)}.
The typo is that m and r on the RHS should match n and k on the LHS.
I feel th
On 10 Gru, 21:45, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 12:26 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > OK...
>
> > so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at
> > switch from experimental to optional something went wrong on my
On Dec 10, 2007 12:26 PM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK...
>
> so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at
> switch from experimental to optional something went wrong on my local
> machine... now it says:
>
> sage: import rpy
> sage: rpy.r
>
> ...
>
>
OK...
so I removed this file, and it is now never... well... seems that at
switch from experimental to optional something went wrong on my local
machine... now it says:
sage: import rpy
sage: rpy.r
...
/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rpy.py in __repr__(self)
321
322 def
Well, now that's indeed strange... maybe old version that I had
installed from -experimental messed something up, and it doesn't
update this file so maybe it's old one?... this could explain why it
looks different... revision of this file is quite old, that's Id tag:
rpy.py 342 2007-02-20 16:41:47
On Dec 10, 2007 11:33 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Gru, 19:57, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I've seen that R moved from experimental to optio
On 10 Gru, 19:57, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as
> > r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got:
>
> > sage: import rpy
> > ---
On Dec 10, 2007 11:05 AM, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I upgraded my SAGE install from feisty to gutsy by adding XUbuntu via:
I assume you're using sage-vmware?
> sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop
>
> and then doing an upgrade using the Upgrade manager.
Excellent.
Hi all,
I upgraded my SAGE install from feisty to gutsy by adding XUbuntu via:
sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop
and then doing an upgrade using the Upgrade manager.
One item that seemed to break was the "notebook" script (which I'm
having a hard time finding, where is it located?). It fail
On Dec 10, 2007 10:50 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as
> r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got:
>
> sage: import rpy
> ---
> Traceback (m
Hi,
I've seen that R moved from experimental to optional, now as
r-2.6.1.p6, tryied it but got:
sage: import rpy
---
Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/giniu/ in ()
/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
On Dec 10, 2007 8:38 AM, samba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello everybody,
>
> I try sage and it's very powerful, but I'm wondering if it's possible
> to run sage in a cluster, or if you know, to post some link which
> explain how to to this.
You might find dsage useful, at least for *certai
hello everybody,
I try sage and it's very powerful, but I'm wondering if it's possible
to run sage in a cluster, or if you know, to post some link which
explain how to to this.
Thanks,
samba.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-suppor
On Dec 9, 2007 9:14 PM, Robert Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I saw the post about the link problem as 2999 others and I
> downloded atfer reading Slashdot.
>
> Here's what I get.
>
> -bash: ./sage: No such file or directory
> Spot:~/sage robertlockwood$
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 9:04
On Dec 10, 6:46 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In case you're curious, here are some timings for higher powers along
> with memory usage.
>
> sage: s = SFASchur(QQ)
> sage: f = s([2,1])
> sage: get_memory_usage()
> 515.17578125
>
> sage: time a = f^10
> CPU times: user 6.64 s, sy
25 matches
Mail list logo
