On Dec 5, 2007 6:47 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In appreciation of this, any chance you could add a FAQ entry based on what
> you just learned? thanks!
>
>http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq
I added a small example program that constructs a field and gets a few
elements since
On Dec 4, 10:30 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 1:04 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Dec 4, 9:33 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
> >> Still seeing mwrank crashing during the tests (10.5), b
On Dec 5, 2007 6:47 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In appreciation of this, any chance you could add a FAQ entry based on what
> you just learned? thanks!
>
>http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq
Done :-)
--
Carlo Hamalainen
http://carlo-hamalainen.net
--~--~-~--~~-
On Dec 4, 2007, at 1:04 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Dec 4, 9:33 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
>> Still seeing mwrank crashing during the tests (10.5), but no comment
>> in the logs.
>
> Any chance you could narrow this down to a
On Dec 4, 9:33 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > Sage 2.8.15 has been released. It is available at
>
> >http://sagemath.org/download.html
>
> Built and tested w/o errors on Mac OS X, as fol
On Dec 4, 2007 12:40 PM, Carlo Hamalainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 12:22 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > try:
> >
> > #clang c++
> > #clib givaro gmpxx gmp m stdc++
> > cimport sage.rings.finite_field_givaro
> >
> > i.e. you need to use C++ to compile your c
On Dec 5, 2007 12:22 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> try:
>
> #clang c++
> #clib givaro gmpxx gmp m stdc++
> cimport sage.rings.finite_field_givaro
>
> i.e. you need to use C++ to compile your code as both Givaro and NTL are C++
> libraries and you need to link in a bunch of libra
On Dec 3, 2007, at 23:27 , William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 2.8.15 has been released. It is available at
>
>http://sagemath.org/download.html
Built and tested w/o errors on Mac OS X, as follows, both with
"parallel make":
10.4.11 (Dual Quad-Core Xeon -j6):
real
On Dec 4, 2007, at 07:24 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 6:00 AM, mabshoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 4, 11:44 am, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> I'm still not sure how to recover my old worksheets. Should I be
>>> looking elsewhere?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
oh, message at about same minute...btw... check out:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/06/10/3553.html - seem there
is optional package that can deal with it
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
I don't actually know, but as I mentioned before, even when I run
version from that package outside of sage, I get that error about
X11...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
On Dec 4, 2007 8:17 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely
> > possible.
>
> when I do sage: r.png() I get:
>
> : Error in function (filename = "Rplot
> %03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, :
> X11 is not
On Dec 4, 2007 8:17 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely
> > possible.
>
> when I do sage: r.png() I get:
>
> : Error in function (filename = "Rplot
> %03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, :
> X11 is not
> I was able to get the image to work last time I tried, so it's definitely
> possible.
when I do sage: r.png() I get:
: Error in function (filename = "Rplot
%03d.png", width = 480, height = 480, :
X11 is not available
and well.. that's both from console and notebook, and from plain
R /o
On Dec 4, 2007 7:42 AM, john_perry_usm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure I've seen this somewhere, but I can't find it now. How do I
> delete a published worksheet?
This is unfortunately not implemented. It will hopefully get implemented
soon... i.e., when the quarter is over.
-
On Dec 4, 2007 7:51 AM, gginiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > sage: install_package('sage -i r-2.6.1rc.p1')
>
> I actually installed through command line, but it's mostly same - it
> went ok, but.
>
> > and report back whether the install works for you or not (it's an
> > experiment
Hi,
> sage: install_package('sage -i r-2.6.1rc.p1')
I actually installed through command line, but it's mostly same - it
went ok, but.
> and report back whether the install works for you or not (it's an experimental
> package still, which means that it's likely to *not* work for a lot of
>
Hi,
I'm sure I've seen this somewhere, but I can't find it now. How do I
delete a published worksheet?
regards
john perry
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
On Dec 4, 2007 6:25 AM, gginiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > There already is an optional/experimental R.spkg and because of rpy
> > little integration work into Python needs to be done. It will probably
> > take a while to expose all the functionality desired by Sage
> > developers dir
On Dec 4, 2007 6:00 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 4, 11:44 am, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm still not sure how to recover my old worksheets. Should I be
> > looking elsewhere?
> >
> > --
> >
> > If the files are now going to be in ~/.sage/sage_notebook
On Dec 4, 2007 6:00 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 4, 11:44 am, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I successfully upgraded 2.8.14 -> 2.8.15 [Mac OS X 10.4.11, 2 GHz
> > Intel Core 2 Duo, 1 GB].
> >
> > But my worksheets do not appear when I do sage -notebook
Your workshee
On Dec 4, 3:25 pm, gginiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > There already is an optional/experimental R.spkg and because of rpy
> > little integration work into Python needs to be done. It will probably
> > take a while to expose all the functionality desired by Sage
> > developers directly
Hi,
> There already is an optional/experimental R.spkg and because of rpy
> little integration work into Python needs to be done. It will probably
> take a while to expose all the functionality desired by Sage
> developers directly, but we need to start by including it.
well, then if there is an
Hi Carlo,
try:
#clang c++
#clib givaro gmpxx gmp m stdc++
cimport sage.rings.finite_field_givaro
i.e. you need to use C++ to compile your code as both Givaro and NTL are C++
libraries and you need to link in a bunch of libraries.
Martin
PS: I know, "clang c++" is not a very nice idea for an
On Dec 3, 11:32 pm, "Carlo Hamalainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to write a spyx file to do some things with finite fields. I'm
> guessing that my first step is to cimport either finite_field_givaro
> or finite_field_ntl_gf2e (given that the pxd files exist in my sage
> source
On Dec 4, 11:44 am, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I successfully upgraded 2.8.14 -> 2.8.15 [Mac OS X 10.4.11, 2 GHz
> Intel Core 2 Duo, 1 GB].
>
> But my worksheets do not appear when I do sage -notebook
>
> I'm told that "The notebook files are stored in: ~/.sage/
> sage_notebook", but the
On Dec 4, 11:24 am, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WooHoo :)
>
> that's great news... I'm just upgrading it to look around asap... :)
>
> btw, is it really true that R interface is so-almost-ready that it
> could be included in release planned for end of week so in few days? I
>
On Dec 4, 2007, at 5:09 AM, fwc wrote:
>>> 1) Taylor series of a rational function.
>>
>>> This works:
>>> sage: cos(x).taylor(x,0,2)
>>
>>> This doesn't:
>>> sage: x/(1+x).taylor(x,0,2)
>>
>>> This is very confusing:
>
>> This is due to the fact that '.' binds tighter than '/'. For
>> examp
Maybe printing the values makes it clearer?
sage: R = Integers(125)
sage: g = R.multiplicative_generator(); g
2
sage: b = g^3; b
8
sage: a = b^17; a
123
sage: a.log(b)
17
So, 123 = 8^(17) mod 125:
sage: R(123).log(8)
17
sage: R(123) == R(8)^(17)
True
On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 AM, Timothy Clemans <[
On Dec 4, 2:30 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Taylor series of a rational function.
>
> > This works:
> > sage: cos(x).taylor(x,0,2)
>
> > This doesn't:
> > sage: x/(1+x).taylor(x,0,2)
>
> > This is very confusing:
> This is due to the fact that '.' binds tighter than '/'
I successfully upgraded 2.8.14 -> 2.8.15 [Mac OS X 10.4.11, 2 GHz
Intel Core 2 Duo, 1 GB].
But my worksheets do not appear when I do sage -notebook
I'm told that "The notebook files are stored in: ~/.sage/
sage_notebook", but there's no trace there. However they do seem to
be in ~/sage_noteb
Hi I want to know how to compute discrete logarithms in Z_p, but I
can't seem to understand the explanation on
http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/doc/html/const/node63.html
I understand that 125 in "sage: r = Integers(125)" is m but what is 3
and what is 17? Is 3 a or is it b?
When I tried
WooHoo :)
that's great news... I'm just upgrading it to look around asap... :)
btw, is it really true that R interface is so-almost-ready that it
could be included in release planned for end of week so in few days? I
would be quite amazed to see it so soon :)
regards,
Andrzej Giniewicz.
--~--~
33 matches
Mail list logo
