PS - A mugshot of the culprit:
http://www.rlmiller.org/bug.jpg
On Nov 23, 10:16 am, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The complexity predicting the running time of this algorithm is
> difficult to analyze, and depends very deeply on the structure of the
> graph itself. With G and Pi as
On Nov 23, 9:15 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently making sure that my code compiles ok with gcc 4.2.1 and
> will upload a patch so this will be fixed soon.
>
> John Cremona
Ok, an updated spkg that merges John's changes is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ma
On Nov 23, 8:58 pm, trio123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Hello,
>
> I'm running SAGE 2.8.12 on Ubuntu 6.06 built from source and I can't
> seem to get notebook() to run.
> Any ideas?
>
Just a hunch: can you rename $HOME/.sage to something else and start
Sage again? It seems odd that you ar
Hi
I'm running SAGE 2.8.12 on Ubuntu 6.06 built from source and I can't
seem to get notebook() to run.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Error message down below:
control:~> sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.12, Release Date: 2007-11-06
I am currently making sure that my code compiles ok with gcc 4.2.1 and
will upload a patch so this will be fixed soon.
John Cremona
On 23/11/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2007 7:43 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I seen in anno
On Nov 23, 6:55 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 4:38 AM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 23, 9:15 am, Alexander Dreyer
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hello Alexander,
> > Hello Alexander,
>
> > > sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the followin
The complexity predicting the running time of this algorithm is
difficult to analyze, and depends very deeply on the structure of the
graph itself. With G and Pi as you have them, I'm looking at
sage: g = Graph(G)
sage: g.show(partition=Pi)
and it seems to be moderately symmetric. Usually when thi
On Nov 23, 2007 4:38 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 23, 9:15 am, Alexander Dreyer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Alexander,
>
> > sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the following system:
> > Linux node179 2.6.16.27-0.6-smp-perfctr #2 SMP Thu Oct 11 10:04:48
> > CEST 2007
On Nov 22, 2007 7:43 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I seen in announcement that it fails for "cremona.spkg fails to
> compile on Linux/Itanium with older gcc and also Solaris." - but my
> system doesn't fall to that category I think so I decided to report...
> not cou
On Nov 23, 2007 4:52 AM, sjbale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a new Sage user, coming from Mathematica. When i use the notebook
> interface it doesn't seem to save any input until I press CTRL+Enter
> to evaluate the expressions. If I click the save and close button any
> unevaluated input is l
On Nov 23, 2:27 pm, Gregory Vanuxem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le vendredi 23 novembre 2007 à 04:47 -0800, mabshoff a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> > > g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include -
> > > DNTL_ALL -I/opt/sage/local/include -I/opt/sage/local/inclu
Hello,
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2007 à 04:47 -0800, mabshoff a écrit :
[...]
> >
> > g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include -
> > DNTL_ALL -I/opt/sage/local/include -I/opt/sage/local/include tsat3.cc
> > -o tsat3_n.o
> > In file included from tsat3.cc:37:
> > ../g0
On Nov 22, 4:06 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 11:34 PM, D. M. Monarres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > When trying to upgrade from 2.8.12 installed from binaries downloaded
> > from the web, I am getting the following error after restarting what
Hi,
I'm a new Sage user, coming from Mathematica. When i use the notebook
interface it doesn't seem to save any input until I press CTRL+Enter
to evaluate the expressions. If I click the save and close button any
unevaluated input is lost when I re-open the worksheet. However,
evaluating the whol
Sorry to reply to myself this quickly, but this issue is now ticket
#1247, see
http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1247
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, s
Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello Andrzej
> I seen in announcement that it fails for "cremona.spkg fails to
> compile on Linux/Itanium with older gcc and also Solaris." - but my
> system doesn't fall to that category I think so I decided to report...
Excellent that you report this. It se
On Nov 23, 4:05 am, Dustin Pluta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Dustin,
>
> I ran across a graph and partition for which it takes the search_tree
> function 6 hours on my machine to complete, and I was wondering if
> this is something to be expected, or a possible bug. I've been
> wor
On Nov 23, 9:15 am, Alexander Dreyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Alexander,
> sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the following system:
> Linux node179 2.6.16.27-0.6-smp-perfctr #2 SMP Thu Oct 11 10:04:48
> CEST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This looks like a 64 bit SuSE 10.1 box - am I
Hi,
I seen in announcement that it fails for "cremona.spkg fails to
compile on Linux/Itanium with older gcc and also Solaris." - but my
system doesn't fall to that category I think so I decided to report...
not counting plenty (281) warnings in file curvesort.cc (about
deprecated conversion from
sage-2.8.13 fails to build on the following system:
Linux node179 2.6.16.27-0.6-smp-perfctr #2 SMP Thu Oct 11 10:04:48
CEST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Best regards,
Alexander Dreyer
PS: The crucial part of the logs:
GCC Version
gcc
20 matches
Mail list logo
