[sage-support] Re: How to run the notebook in the background

On 8/13/07, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for the responses. It turns out that indeed sending a sigint > does the trick, but you have to send it to the right process. In > hindsight it's the obvious one, but it took me some experimentation. > For posterity: > > In order to kill

[sage-support] Re: Yet another sage building problem

On 8/13/07, legout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > i´m using Arch Linux on an IBM T60 (i686). RAM is 1 GB and Swap is 1 > GB too. > Oh right. OK, so I've never heard of Arch Linux before, and I don't think any other SAGE developers use it. Thus probably SAGE would have to be "ported" to

[sage-support] Re: How to run the notebook in the background

Thank you for the responses. It turns out that indeed sending a sigint does the trick, but you have to send it to the right process. In hindsight it's the obvious one, but it took me some experimentation. For posterity: In order to kill a sage notebook gracefully, execute (pun not quite intended)

[sage-support] Re: Yet another sage building problem

Hi, i´m using Arch Linux on an IBM T60 (i686). RAM is 1 GB and Swap is 1 GB too. Thanks volker On 14 Aug., 02:47, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/13/07, legout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > trying to build sage-2.8 failed. It gave a seg. fault while building

[sage-support] Re: SAGE 2.6?

- Original Message - From: "mabshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "sage-support" Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 6:09 AM Subject: [sage-support] Re: SAGE 2.6? > On Jul 29, 5:44 am, FBarbuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello Folks, > > Hello Fausto, > >> I had SAGE 2.6 and upgraded it to 2

[sage-support] Re: function name?

On 8/13/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am probably missing something basic, but I cannot > find the way to recover the name of a function. For example, > > x = var('x') > f = function('hello', x) > > I'd like a method (name, say) which returns the > string "hello", so something li

[sage-support] Re: Yet another sage building problem

On 8/13/07, legout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > trying to build sage-2.8 failed. It gave a seg. fault while building > clisp (Speicherzugriffsfehler = Seg. Fault) Please post the architecture, operating system, amount of RAM, and anything else you can think of that is relevant to th

[sage-support] Re: Why are these finite field elements not equal?

On 4/3/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 22:53, Kate Minola wrote: > > Would a kind person explain to me why element 1 and element 2 > > are not equal? And what I need to do to test if element 1 is zero > > in K? It's a bug. > > # setup > > f = conway_polyn

[sage-support] Yet another sage building problem

Hi, trying to build sage-2.8 failed. It gave a seg. fault while building clisp (Speicherzugriffsfehler = Seg. Fault) gcc -g -O2 -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn- type -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O2 -fexpensive- optimizations -falign-functions=4 -DNO_MULTI

[sage-support] Re: How to run the notebook in the background

On Aug 13, 2007, at 14:02 , Nils Bruin wrote: > > What is the recommended way of starting sage as a server for the > notebook in a way that is detached from > any terminal? The issues I am running into currently: > > sage -notebook secure=True &> sage.log > does not have the desired effect: The

[sage-support] Re: How to run the notebook in the background

Hello, On Aug 13, 11:02 pm, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the recommended way of starting sage as a server for the > notebook in a way that is detached from > any terminal? It has been suggested to add an option to demonize the sage process, but that hasn't happended yet. > T

[sage-support] How to run the notebook in the background

What is the recommended way of starting sage as a server for the notebook in a way that is detached from any terminal? The issues I am running into currently: sage -notebook secure=True &> sage.log sage.log http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ a

[sage-support] Re: trouble compiling sage-2.8

On Aug 13, 5:47 pm, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, Hello, > > I'm trying to compile sage-2.8 and it breaks down on linbox_wrap, with > the message: > >checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no >configure: error: > >

[sage-support] trouble compiling sage-2.8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm trying to compile sage-2.8 and it breaks down on linbox_wrap, with the message: checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no configure: error: *** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! *** *** libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh have a version mi

[sage-support] function name?

Hi: I am probably missing something basic, but I cannot find the way to recover the name of a function. For example, x = var('x') f = function('hello', x) I'd like a method (name, say) which returns the string "hello", so something like: sage: f.name() 'hello' should work. My ugly hack is the f

[sage-support] Re: building sage

I believe compilation problems of linbox with your gcc version have already been reported. You might try 2.8, which was just released and has a some changes to linbox. On 8/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have tried to build sage series 2.7 and had no success. My system

[sage-support] building sage

I have tried to build sage series 2.7 and had no success. My system is Ubuntu dapper and the compiler gcc 4.2.1. Got a message of error with linbox compilation. The last successful building was with series 2.6. Is anybody having similar troubles? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~-