On Tuesday 20 March 2007 4:29 am, DanK wrote:
> One more question: Is there a command to get the total time for all
> computings in one notebook sheet(?)?
> I know the command time for one cell of sage.
The command "cputime()" returns the total CPU time used in that notebook
sheet. The comand w
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 4:11 am, DanK wrote:
> Is there a possiibility to not gain this error?
> Sometimes when I made an Output the error Output truncated occured, is
> it possible to say sage, to show the complete Output?
Click on the left side of the error and you'll see the rest of it
(as it
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 9:30 am, Hamptonio wrote:
> Just to clarify: the downloading problem isn't biopython-specific - I
> can't get anything from www.sagemath.org through sage, only from a
> browser. For example, 'sage -optional' fails as well.
Sorry, you have to do this (note the http://) --
On 3/20/07, Arthur Gaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're probably well aware of it, but U. Wash's version of Modular
> currently appears to be down (or at least unreachable).
We have downtime for several days due to server room
rewiring, and there's not much I can do about it... except
make a
Hi,
thank you for your help. I have changed it to:
v=1; w=1; x=1 #Berechnung von Vp,t noch ohne modulo q
for i in range(1,((p-1)/2)+1):
v=z^i-z^(-i)%q
R=Integers(q)
w=R(v)^(i^expo)
x=(x*w)%q
it give the same results like the faster algorithm and now I can
compute primes with a higher value w
On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:11 AM, DanK wrote:
> sage: v=1; w=1; x=1 #Berechnung von Vp,t noch ohne modulo q
> sage: for i in range(1,((p-1)/2)+1):
> ... v=z^i-z^(-i)%q
> ... w=v^(i^expo)
> ... x=(x*w)%q
One serious problem is, that on the line
> ... w=v^(i^expo)
you are doing the modular arithmeti
One more question: Is there a command to get the total time for all
computings in one notebook sheet(?)?
I know the command time for one cell of sage.
Daniel Köhl
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscr
Hi,
I tried a little bit and I think I have programmed the test for
Vandiver´s conjecture like Buhler et. al. described it in their
papers. I have both ways the slow and fast in the notebook of sage. I
will show it to you here and hope you can eventually show me some
points were are mistakes, if
