>
> No, I don't think there will be any. This is definitely by choice of
> the AMS though, since we put substantial effort and thought into an
> AMS minicourse proposal, but it was rejected.
Jason G. says, "it might be nice to get an idea of what they did/
didn't do" ... since we might want to
At the meetings in San Diego a few years ago I had a discussion with
some of the folks who are part of the program committee apparatus and
approved topics for MAA sessions, panels, etc. and I was asking about
proposing a panel or session on open textbooks. I got the distinct
impression that you w
On Oct 14, 2:35 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> At the meetings in San Diego a few years ago I had a discussion with
> some of the folks who are part of the program committee apparatus and
> approved topics for MAA sessions, panels, etc. and I was asking about
> proposing a panel or session on open tex
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:18 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>>
I said:
>> No, I don't think there will be any. This is definitely by choice of
>> the AMS though, since we put substantial effort and thought into an
>> AMS minicourse proposal, but it was rejected.
OK, I have to back peddle. I'm check
Rob Beezer wrote:
> At the meetings in San Diego a few years ago I had a discussion with
> some of the folks who are part of the program committee apparatus and
> approved topics for MAA sessions, panels, etc. and I was asking about
> proposing a panel or session on open textbooks. I got the dist
> OK, I have to back peddle. I'm checking through all my email, and
> it's true that we did put together a proposal for the 2009 JMM, but
> then (in consultation with somebody on the committee) decided not to
> submit it, partly because of another Sage MAA minicourse proposal for
> the same meeti
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:22 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> OK, I have to back peddle. I'm checking through all my email, and
>> it's true that we did put together a proposal for the 2009 JMM, but
>> then (in consultation with somebody on the committee) decided not to
>> submit it, partly because of a
