On Sep 21, 11:17 pm, michel paul wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> One idea you may want to consider is using Sage strictly *without* any
>
> > programming per se
>
> Something that occurred as kind of a surprise - an example problem in our
> text involved the incom
Hi Michel,
> I was contemplating discussing something like an interval testing
> function. But I also notice that testing something like
>
> 2.3 in [1 .. 3, step = .1]
>
> produces False.
I feel it's about rounding computation :
On my sage I test :
1.0+0.1+0.1+0.1+0.1 # displays 1.4
1.4 =
Thank you
R. Briones.
Managua, Nicaragua.
2009/9/15 dmitrey
>
> FuncDesigner is cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac OS etc) Python-
> written framework with automatic differentiation (http://
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_differentiation). License BSD allows
> to use it in both open- and cl
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, kcrisman wrote:
If you can do a similar one with quadratics, you'll really be in business.
Funny thing, in the same problem set (this was a review/preliminary chapter
for analysis) was one of those find the border around the rectangle
problems:
border = x
width
