Why not use octave for image processing? It can be run from within
Sage, and its image processing toolbox is very mature and functional.
>From what I've seen of PIL, its functionality is outstripped by
octave.
-Alasdair
On Jan 10, 1:11 am, lfmartins wrote:
> I'm trying to do image processing i
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Alasdair wrote:
>
> Why not use octave for image processing? It can be run from within
> Sage, and its image processing toolbox is very mature and functional.
> From what I've seen of PIL, its functionality is outstripped by
> octave.
>
> -Alasdair
I don't know
Thanks, I will try it.
What I want do is pretty simple, simply open an image, add noise to it
and try error-correcting codes. I was able to do it easily with PIL. I
am actually thinking of what to use for bit operations, etc. My plan
is to simply use Numpy, but octave may be an alternative.
On S
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Luiz Felipe Martins
wrote:
>
> Thanks, I will try it.
>
> What I want do is pretty simple, simply open an image, add noise to it
> and try error-correcting codes. I was able to do it easily with PIL. I
Cool! Can you post a worksheet or (if you did it in the not
Sure, once I actually write them. So far I just experimented with the stuff.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:25 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Luiz Felipe Martins
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I will try it.
>>
>> What I want do is pretty simple, simply open an image, add noi
Yes, that's octave. As far as I know it only uses ImageMagick for
reading and writing files, and it may well be able to read and write
PBM/PGM/PPM natively. But if you're using linux, then you'll have
ImageMagick available. I don't know if there's a windows port.
-Alasdair
On Jan 11, 12:20 am
