[sage-edu] Re: Textbook converted to Sage worksheets

2010-08-28 Thread Rob Beezer
Thanks, Marshall. That's suppose to be a division slash, not "divides by". ;-) The page source has unicode character 2215, which is suppose to be a division slash: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2215/index.htm So I'd suggest the browser is getting it wrong. But I think it can be

[sage-edu] Re: Textbook converted to Sage worksheets

2010-08-28 Thread mhampton
Here's one from chapter 1: http://www.d.umn.edu/~mhampton/chapter1_firefox_mac.png -Marshall On Aug 28, 1:31 am, Rob Beezer wrote: > HI Marshall, > > Thanks for having a look.  I forgot about the "ff" ligature.  That is > TeX converting consecutive f's into a single character that is the top >

[sage-edu] Re: Textbook converted to Sage worksheets

2010-08-27 Thread Rob Beezer
HI Marshall, Thanks for having a look. I forgot about the "ff" ligature. That is TeX converting consecutive f's into a single character that is the top of the first f morphing into a downstroke for the second f. Eventually it might become a unicode character. Looks slick in Firefox on Linux. B

[sage-edu] Re: Textbook converted to Sage worksheets

2010-08-27 Thread mhampton
Wow, that's fantastic, really impressive effort. Two things I noticed which are presumably mistakes - there is some weird typesetting of double fs, and what I think should be a symbol for "x divides y" comes out slightly superscripted and too big. I've never seen anything like either of them befo