On Apr 25, 12:53 am, Gerald Smith wrote:
Hi,
> I just removed the indicated file and ran it anyway, willing to take the
> risk, as my use is primarily educational rather than oriented towards serious
> number crunching.
This does not matter, even simple problems with linear algebra can
tr
Hello folks,
Sage 3.3 is out, but it is a sources only release due to the upcoming
3.4 being here in about 4 days :)
Feel free to read all the details at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/t/c046166eb4f1b8b9
I would generally recommend to sign up for the sage-announce list. It
is ex
On Feb 15, 6:17 am, David Joyner wrote:
Hi,
> Hi Herli. There are people working on this, but off the top of my head
> I am not sure if they are members of this list or not. If no one replies
> within several days, I'll dig up emails and try to get your question to the
> right people or else
On Jan 27, 4:28 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:12 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 1/27/2009 2:38:49 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > wst...@gmail.com writes:
> > This discussion should be on sage-nt, the list for sage number theory
> > discussion:
> > O
