On Apr 15, 12:28 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Very interesting. I would point out that it is a shame that there is
> nothing on Integral Domains, quite possibly because Sage has not that
> much useful to say about them per se (or UFDs or Euc. Domains...)?
Not so much a lack of support in Sage, but the
Very interesting. I would point out that it is a shame that there is
nothing on Integral Domains, quite possibly because Sage has not that
much useful to say about them per se (or UFDs or Euc. Domains...)?
- kcrisman
On Apr 15, 1:16 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I've about finished up a serious run o
I've about finished up a serious run of using Sage in a course about
rings, domains, vector spaces, fields, posets, Boolean algebra and
Galois theory. I've learned a lot myself about Sage, and will
probably greatly spruce-up these resources when I use them a second
time. But I though folks might
