[sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

2013-03-16 Thread than...@debian.org
Am Samstag, 16. März 2013 20:57:13 UTC+1 schrieb leif: > > Julien Puydt wrote: > > The proposition isn't to fork sage to get it into a single distribution, > > but to modify it with upstream so any distribution can easily package it > > correctly. > > But if we switch to git, improve Sage's pa

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

2013-04-10 Thread than...@debian.org
Sorry, there were a few mails that missed the list: On 09.04.2013 09:49, Felix Salfelder wrote: > Hi > > thanks for establishing this! > > i can imagine applying for that project. at least i'll have some time > left in summer, as i'm on parental leave and i found a nursery... > i'd like to discu

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

2013-04-10 Thread than...@debian.org
On 09.04.2013 10:26, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Hi Felix, > > On 04/09/2013 09:49 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote: >> a proper build system for sage ("the library") with the usual dependency >> checks seems neccesary (if not sufficient) for distributions. i can >> think of >> a way to implement this (probab

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

2013-04-10 Thread than...@debian.org
On 09.04.2013 14:18, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 04/09/2013 10:26 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: >>> >>> a build system for sage ("the library") could be used to switch between >>> system headers/libraries and stuff installed to /some/sage/prefix. >>> in order to make use of these switches from sage ("the

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC project: make the Sage build system more distribution friendly

2013-04-10 Thread than...@debian.org
On 10.04.2013 17:43, Felix Salfelder wrote: > Hi Tobias > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: >> No, the toplevel install script must just be able to skip the >> compilation of these spkg's. And tell the Sage library to use the >> libraries that are available and were

[sage-devel] License of the SageMath documentation

2016-12-04 Thread than...@debian.org
Hi, I found conflicting information about the license of the SageMath documentation. While it says nothing in COPYING.txt, it says in src/doc/en/reference/history_and_license/index.rst that "All documentation is released under the GNU Free Documentation License." On the other hand, there are

[sage-devel] Python 2.7.13rc1 breaks UnknownClass

2016-12-06 Thread than...@debian.org
Hi sage-devel, we're almost ready to upload Sage to Debian (in fact we basically have to upload it this week to make sure it's included in the next Debian release). However, on Sunday python 2.7.13rc1 was uploaded to Debian and now we are facing a bug that I didn't quite manage to work around y

Re: [sage-devel] Python 2.7.13rc1 breaks UnknownClass

2016-12-06 Thread than...@debian.org
Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016 01:43:09 UTC schrieb tha...@debian.org: > > On 12/07/2016 01:27 AM, François Bissey wrote: > > On 07/12/16 12:20, tha...@debian.org wrote: > >> Hi sage-devel, > >> > >> we're almost ready to upload Sage to Debian (in fact we basically have > >> to upload it this

[sage-devel] Re: License of the SageMath documentation

2016-12-08 Thread than...@debian.org
The GNU Free Documentation License is not considered a free license by Debian. So if it's this, it can't be included in Debian. :( See https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#GNU_Free_Documentation_License_.28GFDL.29 Am Sonntag, 4. Dezember 2016 21:45:27 UTC schrieb tha...@debian.org: > > Hi, > >

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

2015-04-24 Thread than...@debian.org
Whether it is an embedded fork in sage or it gets its own git repo on the sage github account.. Someone from the sage community would have to fix bugs in both cases. Am Freitag, 24. April 2015 10:37:56 UTC+2 schrieb John Cremona: > > Who is the author of hyperellfrob? > > There is a point in ad